Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmidon, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorPolli, James
dc.contributor.authorWoodcock, Janet
dc.contributor.authorYu, Lawrence X.
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Mansoor A.
dc.contributor.authorHoag, Stephen W.
dc.contributor.authorRaju, Gokaraju K
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-26T23:19:17Z
dc.date.available2017-01-26T23:19:17Z
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.date.submitted2013-11
dc.identifier.issn1550-7416
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106646
dc.description.abstractThis review further clarifies the concept of pharmaceutical quality by design (QbD) and describes its objectives. QbD elements include the following: (1) a quality target product profile (QTPP) that identifies the critical quality attributes (CQAs) of the drug product; (2) product design and understanding including identification of critical material attributes (CMAs); (3) process design and understanding including identification of critical process parameters (CPPs), linking CMAs and CPPs to CQAs; (4) a control strategy that includes specifications for the drug substance(s), excipient(s), and drug product as well as controls for each step of the manufacturing process; and (5) process capability and continual improvement. QbD tools and studies include prior knowledge, risk assessment, mechanistic models, design of experiments (DoE) and data analysis, and process analytical technology (PAT). As the pharmaceutical industry moves toward the implementation of pharmaceutical QbD, a common terminology, understanding of concepts and expectations are necessary. This understanding will facilitate better communication between those involved in risk-based drug development and drug application review.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer USen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-014-9598-3en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceSpringer USen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding Pharmaceutical Quality by Designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationYu, Lawrence X., Gregory Amidon, Mansoor A. Khan, Stephen W. Hoag, James Polli, G. K. Raju, and Janet Woodcock. “Understanding Pharmaceutical Quality by Design.” AAPS J 16, no. 4 (May 23, 2014): 771–783.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Biomedical Innovationen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorRaju, Gokaraju K
dc.relation.journalThe AAPS Journalen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2016-08-18T15:46:19Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderAmerican Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists
dspace.orderedauthorsYu, Lawrence X.; Amidon, Gregory; Khan, Mansoor A.; Hoag, Stephen W.; Polli, James; Raju, G. K.; Woodcock, Janeten_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3551-432X
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record