Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYan, Bowen
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Jianxi
dc.contributor.authorAlstott, Jeffrey D
dc.contributor.authorTriulzi, Giorgio
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T19:17:47Z
dc.date.available2017-06-19T21:40:54Z
dc.date.issued2016-08
dc.identifier.issn0138-9130
dc.identifier.issn1588-2861
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106776
dc.description.abstractTechnology is a complex system with technologies relating to each other in a space that can be mapped as a network. The technology network’s structure can reveal properties of technologies and of human behavior, if it can be mapped accurately. Technology networks have been made from patent data using several measures of proximity. These measures, however, are influenced by factors of the patenting system that do not reflect technologies or their proximity. We introduce a method to precisely normalize out multiple impinging factors in patent data and extract the true signal of technological proximity by comparing the empirical proximity measures with what they would be in random situations that remove the impinging factors. With this method, we created technology networks, using data from 3.9 million patents. After normalization, different measures of proximity became more correlated with each other, approaching a single dimension of technological proximity. The normalized technology networks were sparse, with few pairs of technology domains being significantly related. The normalized network corresponded with human behavior: We analyzed the patenting histories of 2.8 million inventors and found they were more likely to invent in two different technology domains if the pair was closely related in the technology network. We also analyzed the patents of 250,000 firms and found that, in contrast with inventors, firms’ inventive activities were only modestly associated with the technology network; firms’ portfolios combined pairs of technology domains about twice as often as inventors. These results suggest that controlling for impinging factors provides meaningful measures of technological proximity for patent-based mapping of the technology space, and that this map can be used to aid in technology innovation planning and management.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSUTD-MIT International Design Centre (IDC) (Grant IDG31300112)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSingapore. Ministry of Education (Tier 2 Academic Research Grant T2MOE1403)en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2107-yen_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.titleMapping technology space by normalizing patent networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationAlstott, Jeff et al. “Mapping Technology Space by Normalizing Patent Networks.” Scientometrics 110.1 (2017): 443–479.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorAlstott, Jeffrey D
dc.contributor.mitauthorTriulzi, Giorgio
dc.relation.journalScientometricsen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2017-01-26T04:48:43Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderAkadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary
dspace.orderedauthorsAlstott, Jeff; Triulzi, Giorgio; Yan, Bowen; Luo, Jianxien_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record