A methodology for portfolio-level analysis of system commonality

Abstract

Complex systems are increasingly being developed as part of portfolios or sets of related complex systems. This enables synergies such as commonality between portfolio systems that can significantly reduce portfolio life-cycle cost and risk. While offering these benefits, commonality usually also incurs up-front as well as life-cycle penalties in cost and risk due to increased design complexity. The resulting trade-off needs to be carried out during the architecting stage of the portfolio life cycle when there is maximum leverage to improve life-cycle properties due to degrees of freedom available in architectural and design decisions. This paper outlines a 4-step methodology for the identification and assessment of commonality opportunities in complex systems portfolios during the architecting stage of the portfolio life cycle. The methodology transforms a solution-neutral description of a portfolio of aerospace systems based on system functionality, requirements, and metrics into a set of preferred portfolio design solutions with commonality. The methodology is based on a 2-stage approach that identifies preferred architectures for each system in the portfolio individually prior to heuristic commonality analysis between systems based on a pairwise assessment of system overlap in functionality, technologies, operational environments, and scale. Application of the methodology is demonstrated with a retrospective analysis of NASA’s Saturn launch vehicle portfolio.