Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFuhrer, Jürg
dc.contributor.authorVal Martin, Maria
dc.contributor.authorMills, Gina
dc.contributor.authorHeald, Colette L.
dc.contributor.authorHarmens, Harry
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Felicity
dc.contributor.authorSharps, Katrina
dc.contributor.authorBender, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorAshmore, Mike R.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T13:57:01Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T13:57:01Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-15
dc.date.submitted2016-08
dc.identifier.issn20457758
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107409
dc.description.abstractRisks associated with exposure of individual plant species to ozone (O[subcript 3]) are well documented, but implications for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes have received insufficient attention. This is an important gap because feedbacks to the atmosphere may change as future O[subcript 3] levels increase or decrease, depending on air quality and climate policies. Global simulation of O[subcript 3] using the Community Earth System Model (CESM) revealed that in 2000, about 40% of the Global 200 terrestrial ecoregions (ER) were exposed to O[subcript 3] above thresholds for ecological risks, with highest exposures in North America and Southern Europe, where there is field evidence of adverse effects of O[subcript 3], and in central Asia. Experimental studies show that O[subcript 3] can adversely affect the growth and flowering of plants and alter species composition and richness, although some communities can be resilient. Additional effects include changes in water flux regulation, pollination efficiency, and plant pathogen development. Recent research is unraveling a range of effects below-ground, including changes in soil invertebrates, plant litter quantity and quality, decomposition, and nutrient cycling and carbon pools. Changes are likely slow and may take decades to become detectable. CESM simulations for 2050 show that O[subcript 3] exposure under emission scenario RCP8.5 increases in all major biomes and that policies represented in scenario RCP4.5 do not lead to a general reduction in O[subcript 3] risks; rather, 50% of ERs still show an increase in exposure. Although a conceptual model is lacking to extrapolate documented effects to ERs with limited or no local information, and there is uncertainty about interactions with nitrogen input and climate change, the analysis suggests that in many ERs, O[subcript 3] risks will persist for biodiversity at different trophic levels, and for a range of ecosystem processes and feedbacks, which deserves more attention when assessing ecological implications of future atmospheric pollution and climate change.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGreat Britain. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (contract AQ0833)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNorth American Electric Reliability Corporationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States-Canada Research Consultation Group on the Long-Range Transport of Air Pollutantsen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. National Park Service e (grant H2370 094000/J2350103006)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (AGS- 1238109)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Department of Energy. Office of Scienceen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Center for Atmospheric Research (U.S.) Climate Simulation Laboratory (Computational and Information Systems Laboratory (CISL))en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2568en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceWileyen_US
dc.titleCurrent and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationFuhrer, Jürg, Maria Val Martin, Gina Mills, Colette L. Heald, Harry Harmens, Felicity Hayes, Katrina Sharps, Jürgen Bender, and Mike R. Ashmore. “Current and Future Ozone Risks to Global Terrestrial Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes.” Ecology and Evolution 6, no. 24 (November 21, 2016): 8785–8799.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHeald, Colette L.
dc.relation.journalEcology and Evolutionen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsFuhrer, Jürg; Val Martin, Maria; Mills, Gina; Heald, Colette L.; Harmens, Harry; Hayes, Felicity; Sharps, Katrina; Bender, Jürgen; Ashmore, Mike R.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2894-5738
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record