Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEngelward, Bevin P
dc.contributor.authorYanch, Jacquelyn C
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T15:53:55Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T15:53:55Z
dc.date.issued2012-11
dc.identifier.issn0091-6765
dc.identifier.issn1552-9924
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107839
dc.description.abstractSummary - Melzer raises many interesting points regarding our study of low dose-rate radiation (Olipitz et al. 2012). Responding to his letter gives us the opportunity to clarify the rationale behind some of our approaches and interpretations.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEnvironmental Health Perspectivesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1205595r/en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciencesen_US
dc.titleRadiation dose-rate: Engelward and Yanch responden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationEngelward, Bevin and Jacquelyn Yanch. “Radiation Dose-Rate: Engelward and Yanch Respond.” “Environmental Health Perspectives” Volume 120, no. 11 (November 2012): a417–a418.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorEngelward, Bevin P
dc.contributor.mitauthorYanch, Jacquelyn C
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Health Perspectivesen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsEngelward, Bevin, Yanch, Jacquelynen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record