Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMalloy, Timothy F.
dc.contributor.authorZaunbrecher, Virginia M.
dc.contributor.authorBatteate, Christina
dc.contributor.authorBlake, Ann
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, William F.
dc.contributor.authorCorbett, Charles J.
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Steffen Foss
dc.contributor.authorLempert, Robert
dc.contributor.authorLinkov, Igor
dc.contributor.authorMcFadden, Roger
dc.contributor.authorOstrom, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorSchoenung, Julie
dc.contributor.authorSeager, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSinsheimer, Peter
dc.contributor.authorThayer, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Kelly H.
dc.contributor.authorOlivetti, Elsa A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T16:44:30Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T16:44:30Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.date.submitted2016-09
dc.identifier.issn0091-6765
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107840
dc.description.abstractBackground: Decision analysis—a systematic approach to solving complex problems —offers tools and frameworks to support decision making that are increasingly being applied to environmental challenges. Alternatives analysis is a method used in regulation and product design to identify, compare, and evaluate the safety and viability of potential substitutes for hazardous chemicals. Objectives: Assess whether decision science may assist the alternatives analysis decision maker in comparing alternatives across a range of metrics. Methods: A workshop was convened that included representatives from government, academia, business, and civil society and included experts in toxicology, decision science, alternatives assessment, engineering, and law and policy. Participants were divided into two groups and prompted with targeted questions. Throughout the workshop, the groups periodically came together in plenary sessions to reflect on other groups’ findings. Discussion: We conclude the further incorporation of decision science into alternatives analysis would advance the ability of companies and regulators to select alternatives to harmful ingredients, and would also advance the science of decision analysis. Conclusions: We advance four recommendations: (1) engaging the systematic development and evaluation of decision approaches and tools; (2) using case studies to advance the integration of decision analysis into alternatives analysis; (3) supporting transdisciplinary research; and (4) supporting education and outreach efforts. .en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) ((NSF DBI-0830117)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (NSF DBI-1266377)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Environmental Protection Agencyen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEnvironmental Health Perspectivesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp483en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciencesen_US
dc.titleAdvancing Alternative Analysis: Integration of Decision Scienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMalloy, Timothy F., Virginia M. Zaunbrecher, Christina Batteate, Ann Blake, William F. Carroll, Charles J. Corbett, Steffen Foss Hansen, et al. “Advancing Alternative Analysis: Integration of Decision Science.” Environmental Health Perspectives (October 28, 2016).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Materials Processing Centeren_US
dc.contributor.departmentLincoln Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Energy Initiativeen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorMoran, Kelly H.
dc.contributor.mitauthorOlivetti, Elsa A.
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Health Perspectivesen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsMalloy, Timothy F.; Zaunbrecher, Virginia M.; Batteate, Christina; Blake, Ann; Carroll, William F.; Corbett, Charles J.; Hansen, Steffen Foss; Lempert, Robert; Linkov, Igor; McFadden, Roger; Moran, Kelly D.; Olivetti, Elsa; Ostrom, Nancy; Romero, Michelle; Schoenung, Julie; Seager, Thomas; Sinsheimer, Peter; Thayer, Kristinaen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8043-2385
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record