Edges and linearization: A reply
Author(s)
Trinh, Tue Huu
DownloadTrinh-2010-Edges and linearizat.pdf (783.4Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This is my reply to the commentaries on Trinh (2009). I thank the commentators – Enoch Aboh, Josef Bayer, Nigel Duffield, Roland Hinterhölzl, Anders Holmberg, Shinichiro Ishihara and Gereon Müller – for their helpful critiques, which point out several shortcomings of the target paper, opened up areas where new predictions can be made and raised questions to be investigated in future research. It is unfortunate that these critiques and this reply did not appear in the same volume. The first section of the reply will hence be a brief summary of my proposal. The theory will be presented in a slightly different way, more transparent than the original formulation but equivalent with it in content. It is my hope that the reformulation will address some of the questions raised in the commentaries. Other issues are discussed in the sections that follow
Date issued
2010-10Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyJournal
Theoretical Linguistics
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter
Citation
Trinh, Tue. “Edges and Linearization: A Reply.” Theoretical Linguistics 36, no. 1 (January 2010). © 2010 Walter de Gruyte
Version: Final published version
ISSN
0301-4428
1613-4060