Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTyrrell, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorJones, Samuel E
dc.contributor.authorBeaumont, Robin
dc.contributor.authorAstley, Christina M
dc.contributor.authorLovell, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorYaghootkar, Hanieh
dc.contributor.authorTuke, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorRuth, Katherine S
dc.contributor.authorFreathy, Rachel M
dc.contributor.authorWood, Andrew R
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Anna
dc.contributor.authorWeedon, Michael N
dc.contributor.authorFrayling, Timothy M
dc.contributor.authorHirschhorn, Joel N
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-15T14:06:12Z
dc.date.available2017-05-15T14:06:12Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifier.issn0959-8138
dc.identifier.issn1468-5833
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109077
dc.description.abstractAbstract Objective To determine whether height and body mass index (BMI) have a causal role in five measures of socioeconomic status. Design Mendelian randomisation study to test for causal effects of differences in stature and BMI on five measures of socioeconomic status. Mendelian randomisation exploits the fact that genotypes are randomly assigned at conception and thus not confounded by non-genetic factors. Setting UK Biobank. Participants 119,669 men and women of British ancestry, aged between 37 and 73 years. Main outcome measures Age completed full time education, degree level education, job class, annual household income, and Townsend deprivation index. Results In the UK Biobank study, shorter stature and higher BMI were observationally associated with several measures of lower socioeconomic status. The associations between shorter stature and lower socioeconomic status tended to be stronger in men, and the associations between higher BMI and lower socioeconomic status tended to be stronger in women. For example, a 1 standard deviation (SD) higher BMI was associated with a £210 (€276; $300; 95% confidence interval £84 to £420; P=6×10⁻³) lower annual household income in men and a £1890 (£1680 to £2100; P=6×10⁻¹⁵) lower annual household income in women. Genetic analysis provided evidence that these associations were partly causal. A genetically determined 1 SD (6.3 cm) taller stature caused a 0.06 (0.02 to 0.09) year older age of completing full time education (P=0.01), a 1.12 (1.07 to 1.18) times higher odds of working in a skilled profession (P=6×10⁻⁷), and a £1130 (£680 to £1580) higher annual household income (P=4×10⁻⁸). Associations were stronger in men. A genetically determined 1 SD higher BMI (4.6 kg/m2) caused a £2940 (£1680 to £4200; P=1×10⁻⁵) lower annual household income and a 0.10 (0.04 to 0.16) SD (P=0.001) higher level of deprivation in women only. Conclusions These data support evidence that height and BMI play an important partial role in determining several aspects of a person’s socioeconomic status, especially women’s BMI for income and deprivation and men’s height for education, income, and job class. These findings have important social and health implications, supporting evidence that overweight people, especially women, are at a disadvantage and that taller people, especially men, are at an advantage.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i582en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unporteden_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.titleHeight, body mass index, and socioeconomic status: mendelian randomisation study in UK Biobanken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationTyrrell, Jessica; Jones, Samuel E; Beaumont, Robin; Astley, Christina M; Lovell, Rebecca; Yaghootkar, Hanieh; Tuke, Marcus et al. “Height, Body Mass Index, and Socioeconomic Status: Mendelian Randomisation Study in UK Biobank.” BMJ (March 2016): i582. © 2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltden_US
dc.contributor.departmentBroad Institute of MIT and Harvarden_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHirschhorn, Joel N
dc.relation.journalBMJen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsTyrrell, Jessica; Jones, Samuel E; Beaumont, Robin; Astley, Christina M; Lovell, Rebecca; Yaghootkar, Hanieh; Tuke, Marcus; Ruth, Katherine S; Freathy, Rachel M; Hirschhorn, Joel N; Wood, Andrew R; Murray, Anna; Weedon, Michael N; Frayling, Timothy Men_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record