Disease and Development: A Reply to Bloom, Canning, and Fink
Author(s)
Acemoglu, K. Daron; Johnson, Simon
DownloadAcemoglu_Disease and.pdf (465.6Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Beginning in the 1940s, a wave of health innovations and more effective international public health measures led to a rapid and large improvement in health; for example, in some relatively poor countries, life expectancy at birth quickly rose from around 40 years to over 60 years. In Acemoglu and Johnson (2006, 2007), we constructed an instrument for these changes in life expectancy: “predicted mortality,” which is calculated from initial mortality by disease and the timing of global disease interventions. Across a wide range of specifications, our work suggests no positive effects—over 40- or 60-year horizons—of life expectancy on GDP per capita (or GDP per working-age population).
Date issued
2014-12Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics; Sloan School of ManagementJournal
Journal of Political Economy
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Citation
Acemoglu, Daron, and Simon Johnson. “Disease and Development: A Reply to Bloom, Canning, and Fink.” Journal of Political Economy 122.6 (2014): 1367–1375. © 2014 The University of Chicago
Version: Final published version
ISSN
0022-3808
1537-534X