Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuthmann, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Tiffany
dc.contributor.authorYang, Maria C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-19T17:13:09Z
dc.date.available2017-05-19T17:13:09Z
dc.date.issued2014-08
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-7918-4634-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109216
dc.description.abstractWeb-based documentation platforms afford lightweight and visually rich mechanisms for designers to share documentation online, yet present challenges regarding representation, particularly for collaborative teams. This paper highlights some of these issues through a descriptive case study based on the use of a new web-based social media tool for documenting the development of design projects called Build in Progress. Undergraduate students worked in teams to design musical construction kits and documented their process using Build in Progress over the course of three weeks. We examined students’ project pages to determine trends with how students visually represented their design process, and we gathered students’ experiences using the platform through surveys and interviews with select project teams. We found that groups developed their own representations of their design process via tree structures afforded by Build in Progress that present the simultaneous development of distinct elements of their projects and highlight the contributions of each student on the team. The interviews revealed differences between how internal and external documentation are presented and contrasting approaches to creating narrative and instructional documentation based on the intended audience. In particular, we found that students interpreted the tool as one used to help others recreate their design, which led to the omission of several parts of their design process, including experimentation and mistakes. These results suggest the need to further develop tools to support reflection on process rather than product.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DETC2014-34686en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)en_US
dc.titleDocumentation in Progress: Challenges With Representing Design Process Onlineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationTseng, Tiffany, Maria Yang, and Stephen Ruthmann. “Documentation in Progress: Challenges With Representing Design Process Online.” Volume 3: 16th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 11th International Conference on Design Education; 7th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices (August 17, 2014). © 2014 ASME Internationalen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Divisionen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Media Arts and Sciences (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorTseng, Tiffany
dc.contributor.mitauthorYang, Maria
dc.relation.journalVolume 3: 16th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 11th International Conference on Design Education; 7th Frontiers in Biomedical Devicesen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsTseng, Tiffany; Yang, Maria; Ruthmann, Stephenen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1407-0723
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7776-3423
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record