Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStalnaker, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-24T19:40:28Z
dc.date.available2017-07-02T05:00:03Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.identifier.issn0031-8116
dc.identifier.issn1573-0883
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109326
dc.description.abstractThanks to Mitch, Zoltan and Liz for their insightful and constructive comments. Their expositions of what I am trying to do in the book seem to me entirely accurate, and their suggestions about the way the framework I develop can be modified and extended, as well as their observations about places where more clarity is needed, are well taken. Mostly in these responses I will be elaborating and expressing agreement, though I will push back at just a few points.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0782-4en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.titleResponsesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationStalnaker, Robert. “Responses.” Philosophical Studies 174, no. 6 (September 15, 2016): 1629-1639.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorStalnaker, Robert
dc.relation.journalPhilosophical Studiesen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2017-04-27T03:44:16Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
dspace.orderedauthorsStalnaker, Roberten_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8503-8662
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record