Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRocha, Leonardo Lima
dc.contributor.authorLima, Alex Heitor
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Caroline Reis Maia
dc.contributor.authorTerra, Jose Cláudio Cyrineu
dc.contributor.authorDeliberato, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorDagan, Alon
dc.contributor.authorCeli, Leo Anthony G.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-16T17:53:48Z
dc.date.available2017-06-16T17:53:48Z
dc.date.issued2017-03
dc.date.submitted2017-01
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109961
dc.description.abstractObjective Physician shift schedules are regularly created manually, using paper or a shared online spreadsheet. Mistakes are not unusual, leading to last minute scrambles to cover a shift. We developed a web-based shift scheduling system and a mobile application tool to facilitate both the monthly scheduling and shift exchanges between physicians. The primary objective was to compare physician satisfaction before and after the mobile application implementation. Methods Over a 9-month period, three surveys, using the 4-point Likert type scale were performed to assess the physician satisfaction. The first survey was conducted three months prior mobile application release, a second survey three months after implementation and the last survey six months after. Results 51 (77%) of the physicians answered the baseline survey. Of those, 32 (63%) were males with a mean age of 37.8 ± 5.5 years. Prior to the mobile application implementation, 36 (70%) of the responders were using more than one method to carry out shift exchanges and only 20 (40%) were using the official department report sheet to document shift exchanges. The second and third survey were answered by 48 (73%) physicians. Forty-eight (98%) of them found the mobile application easy or very easy to install and 47 (96%) did not want to go back to the previous method. Regarding physician satisfaction, at baseline 37% of the physicians were unsatisfied or very unsatisfied with shift scheduling. After the mobile application was implementation, only 4% reported being unsatisfied (OR = 0.11, p < 0.001). The satisfaction level improved from 63% to 96% between the first and the last survey. Satisfaction levels significantly increased between the three time points (OR = 13.33, p < 0.001). Conclusion Our web and mobile phone-based scheduling system resulted in better physician satisfaction.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174127en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePLoSen_US
dc.titlePhysician satisfaction with a multi-platform digital scheduling systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationDeliberato, Rodrigo Octávio; Rocha, Leonardo Lima; Lima, Alex Heitor; Santiago, Caroline Reis Maia; Terra, Jose Cláudio Cyrineu; Dagan, Alon and Celi, Leo Anthony. “Physician Satisfaction with a Multi-Platform Digital Scheduling System.” Edited by Luís A. Nunes Amaral. PLOS ONE 12, no. 3 (March 2017): e0174127 © 2017 Deliberato et alen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard--MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology. Laboratory for Computational Physiologyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorDeliberato, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.mitauthorDagan, Alon
dc.contributor.mitauthorCeli, Leo Anthony G.
dc.relation.journalPLoS ONEen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsDeliberato, Rodrigo Octávio; Rocha, Leonardo Lima; Lima, Alex Heitor; Santiago, Caroline Reis Maia; Terra, Jose Cláudio Cyrineu; Dagan, Alon; Celi, Leo Anthonyen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record