Simple formula for asymmetric Marcus?Hush kinetics
Author(s)
Zeng, Yi; Bai, Peng; Smith, Raymond Barrett; Bazant, Martin Z
DownloadAMHC_approx_SUBMIT.pdf (513.2Kb)
PUBLISHER_CC
Publisher with Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Marcus–Hush theory of electron transfer has seen increasing use as a predictive alternative to the phenomenological Butler–Volmer (BV) equation for Faradaic reactions kinetics. Here, we analyze and simplify the asymmetric Marcus–Hush (AMH) model, first proposed by Marcus and recently used by Compton’s group to fit experimental data that exhibit two different reorganization energies, depending on the sign of the overpotential. The AMH model has a single reorganization energy and an asymmetry parameter to account for different inner sphere force constants, but its practical use is hindered by the need to numerically evaluate the improper integral over the electronic Fermi distribution. Moreover, the domain of integration must be arbitrarily truncated to avoid divergence, due to some ambiguities in the derivation, which also limits the validity of the AMH model to weakly curved Tafel plots. Nevertheless, by defining a region over which the formula applies, we derive a simple formula to replace the Fermi integral by exploiting similarities with our recent approximation of the symmetric limit of the Marcus–Hush–Chidsey (MHC) model. These results enable the AMH model to approach the same ease of use as both the MHC and BV models and highlight the need to develop a more comprehensive theory of asymmetric charge transfer.
Date issued
2015-04Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of MathematicsJournal
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Zeng, Yi, Peng Bai, Raymond B. Smith, and Martin Z. Bazant. “Simple Formula for Asymmetric Marcus–Hush Kinetics.” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 748 (July 2015): 52–57.
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
15726657