Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenderson, Barron H.
dc.contributor.authorSafieddine, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorHeald, Colette L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-28T18:42:07Z
dc.date.available2017-06-28T18:42:07Z
dc.date.issued2017-04
dc.date.submitted2017-01
dc.identifier.issn0094-8276
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110357
dc.description.abstractThe cycling of reactive organic carbon (ROC) is central to tropospheric chemistry. We characterize the global tropospheric ROC budget as simulated with the GEOS-Chem model. We expand the standard simulation by including new emissions and gas-phase chemistry, an expansion of dry and wet removal, and a mass tracking of all ROC species to achieve carbon closure. The resulting global annual mean ROC burden is 16 Tg C, with sources from methane oxidation and direct emissions contributing 415 and 935 Tg C yr⁻¹. ROC is lost from the atmosphere via physical deposition (460 Tg C yr⁻¹), and oxidation to CO/CO2 (875 Tg C yr⁻¹). Ketones, alkanes, alkenes, and aromatic hydrocarbons dominate the ROC burden, whereas aldehydes and isoprene dominate the ROC global mean surface OH reactivity. Simulated OH reactivities are between 0.8–1 s⁻¹, 3–14 s⁻¹, and 12–34 s⁻¹ over selected regions in the remote ocean, continental midlatitudes, and the tropics, respectively, and are consistent with observational constraints.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA14OAR4310132)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072602en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceMIT Web Domainen_US
dc.titleThe global nonmethane reactive organic carbon budget: A modeling perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSafieddine, Sarah A.; Heald, Colette L. and Henderson, Barron H. “The Global Nonmethane Reactive Organic Carbon Budget: A Modeling Perspective.” Geophysical Research Letters 44, no. 8 (April 2017): 3897–3906 © 2017 American Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSafieddine, Sarah
dc.contributor.mitauthorHeald, Colette L.
dc.relation.journalGeophysical Research Lettersen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsSafieddine, Sarah A.; Heald, Colette L.; Henderson, Barron H.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8947-7950
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2894-5738
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record