Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNovais, Eduardo A.
dc.contributor.authorLouzada, Ricardo N.
dc.contributor.authorDang, Sabin
dc.contributor.authorRegatieri, Caio V.S.
dc.contributor.authorWitkin, André J.
dc.contributor.authorBaumal, Caroline R.
dc.contributor.authorHornegger, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorJayaraman, Vijaysekhar
dc.contributor.authorDuker, Jay S.
dc.contributor.authorWaheed, Nadia K.
dc.contributor.authorAdhi, Mehreen
dc.contributor.authorMoult, Eric Michael
dc.contributor.authorCole, Emily D.
dc.contributor.authorHusvogt, Lennart
dc.contributor.authorLee, ByungKun
dc.contributor.authorFujimoto, James G
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-02T15:10:44Z
dc.date.available2017-08-02T15:10:44Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.date.submitted2016-01
dc.identifier.issn0002-9394
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110907
dc.description.abstractPurpose To compare visualization of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using an ultrahigh-speed swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) prototype vs a spectral-domain (SD) OCTA device. Design Comparative analysis of diagnostic instruments. Methods Patients were prospectively recruited to be imaged on SD OCT and SS OCT devices on the same day. The SD OCT device employed is the RTVue Avanti (Optovue, Inc, Fremont, California, USA), which operates at ∼840 nm wavelength and 70 000 A-scans/second. The SS OCT device used is an ultrahigh-speed long-wavelength prototype that operates at ∼1050 nm wavelength and 400 000 A-scans/second. Two observers independently measured the CNV area on OCTA en face images from the 2 devices. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare area measurements and P values of <.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Fourteen eyes from 13 patients were enrolled. The CNV in 11 eyes (78.6%) were classified as type 1, 2 eyes (14.3%) as type 2, and 1 eye (7.1%) as mixed type. Total CNV area measured using SS OCT and SD OCT 3 mm × 3 mm OCTA were 0.949 ± 1.168 mm² and 0.340 ± 0.301 mm², respectively (P = .001). For the 6 mm × 6 mm OCTA the total CNV area using SS OCT and SD OCT were 1.218 ± 1.284 mm² and 0.604 ± 0.597 mm², respectively (P = .0019). The field of view did not significantly affect the measured CNV area (P = .19 and P = .18 for SS OCT and SD OCT, respectively). Conclusion SS OCTA yielded significantly larger CNV areas than SD OCTA. It is possible that SS OCTA is better able to demarcate the full extent of CNV vasculature.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (R01-EY011289-28)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (R44-EY022864-03)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (R01-CA075289-17)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-10-1-0551)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-12-1-0499)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.01.011en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleChoroidal Neovascularization Analyzed on Ultrahigh-Speed Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Compared to Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNovais, Eduardo A.; Adhi, Mehreen; Moult, Eric M. et al. “Choroidal Neovascularization Analyzed on Ultrahigh-Speed Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Compared to Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.” American Journal of Ophthalmology 164 (April 2016): 80–88 © 2016 Elsevier Incen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronicsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorAdhi, Mehreen
dc.contributor.mitauthorMoult, Eric Michael
dc.contributor.mitauthorCole, Emily D.
dc.contributor.mitauthorHusvogt, Lennart
dc.contributor.mitauthorLee, ByungKun
dc.contributor.mitauthorFujimoto, James G
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsNovais, Eduardo A.; Adhi, Mehreen; Moult, Eric M.; Louzada, Ricardo N.; Cole, Emily D.; Husvogt, Lennart; Lee, ByungKun; Dang, Sabin; Regatieri, Caio V.S.; Witkin, André J.; Baumal, Caroline R.; Hornegger, Joachim; Jayaraman, Vijaysekhar; Fujimoto, James G.; Duker, Jay S.; Waheed, Nadia K.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3859-3094
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5262-2264
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-4357
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record