Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpaide, Richard F.
dc.contributor.authorWaheed, Nadia K.
dc.contributor.authorFujimoto, James G
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-02T15:51:46Z
dc.date.available2017-08-02T15:51:46Z
dc.date.issued2015-11
dc.identifier.issn0275-004X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110911
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To describe image artifacts of optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography and their underlying causative mechanisms. To establish a common vocabulary for the artifacts observed. Methods: The methods by which OCT angiography images are acquired, generated, and displayed are reviewed as are the mechanisms by which each or all of these methods can produce extraneous image information. A common set of terminology is proposed and used. Results: Optical coherence tomography angiography uses motion contrast to image blood flow and thereby images the vasculature without the need for a contrast agent. Artifacts are very common and can arise from the OCT image acquisition, intrinsic characteristics of the eye, eye motion, image processing, and display strategies. Optical coherence tomography image acquisition for angiography takes more time than simple structural scans and necessitates trade-offs in flow resolution, scan quality, and speed. An important set of artifacts are projection artifacts in which images of blood vessels seem at erroneous locations. Image processing used for OCT angiography can alter vascular appearance through segmentation defects, and because of image display strategies can give false impressions of the density and location of vessels. Eye motion leads to discontinuities in displayed data. Optical coherence tomography angiography artifacts can be detected by interactive evaluation of the images. Conclusion: Image artifacts are common and can lead to incorrect interpretations of OCT angiography images. Because of the quantity of data available and the potential for artifacts, physician interaction in viewing the image data will be required, much like what happens in modern radiology practice.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (R01- EY011289-29)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-12-1-0449)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer) - Lippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000765en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleIMAGE ARTIFACTS IN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHYen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSpaide, Richard F.; Fujimoto, James G. and Waheed, Nadia K. “IMAGE ARTIFACTS IN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY.” Retina 35, 11 (November 2015): 2163–2180 © 2015 Ophthalmic Communications Society, Incen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronicsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFujimoto, James G
dc.relation.journalRetinaen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsSpaide, Richard F.; Fujimoto, James G.; Waheed, Nadia K.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-4357
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record