Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmengual, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorCoslovsky, Salo
dc.contributor.authorYang, Duanyi
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-21T15:16:51Z
dc.date.available2017-08-21T15:16:51Z
dc.date.issued2017-07
dc.date.submitted2017-04
dc.identifier.issn1748-5983
dc.identifier.issn1748-5991
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110990
dc.description.abstractCompeting accounts of the effect of globalization on labor politics agree that firms influence regulations, but make contrasting predictions for which firms are most likely to oppose regulations. Using survey data from employers in 19,000 manufacturing firms in 82 developing countries, we examine the determinants of employers’ opinions toward labor regulation. In contrast to the predictions of optimistic theories of globalization, we find that (i) firms that export are more likely to have negative opinions toward labor regulation than those that sell domestically, and (ii) firms that receive foreign direct investment have similar views as firms that rely only on domestic capital. Further, we show that systematic differences in employers’ opinions depend on the intensity of the competitive pressures they face and their use of skilled workers. In doing so, we provide an empirically grounded account of the heterogeneous opinions of key actors in economic policymaking in developing countries.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12164en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceAmengualen_US
dc.titleWho opposes labor regulation? Explaining variation in employers’ opinionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationAmengual, Matthew et al.“Who Opposes Labor Regulation? Explaining Variation in Employers’ Opinions.” Regulation & Governance 11, 2 (July 2017): 12164 © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltden_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Managementen_US
dc.contributor.approverAmengual, Matthewen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorAmengual, Matthew
dc.contributor.mitauthorYang, Duanyi
dc.relation.journalRegulation & Governanceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsAmengual, Matthew; Coslovsky, Salo; Yang, Duanyien_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6024-1920
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0473-9040
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record