Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNegahban, Sahand
dc.contributor.authorOh, Sewoong
dc.contributor.authorShah, Devavrat
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-28T18:16:55Z
dc.date.available2017-08-28T18:16:55Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.date.submitted2014-01
dc.identifier.issn0030-364X
dc.identifier.issn1526-5463
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111030
dc.description.abstractThe question of aggregating pairwise comparisons to obtain a global ranking over a collection of objects has been of interest for a very long time: be it ranking of online gamers (e.g., MSR’s TrueSkill system) and chess players, aggregating social opinions, or deciding which product to sell based on transactions. In most settings, in addition to obtaining a ranking, finding ‘scores’ for each object (e.g., player’s rating) is of interest for understanding the intensity of the preferences. In this paper, we propose Rank Centrality, an iterative rank aggregation algorithm for discovering scores for objects (or items) from pairwise comparisons. The algorithm has a natural random walk interpretation over the graph of objects with an edge present between a pair of objects if they are compared; the score, which we call Rank Centrality, of an object turns out to be its stationary probability under this random walk. To study the efficacy of the algorithm, we consider the popular Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model (equivalent to the Multinomial Logit (MNL) for pairwise comparisons) in which each object has an associated score that determines the probabilistic outcomes of pairwise comparisons between objects. In terms of the pairwise marginal probabilities, which is the main subject of this paper, the MNL model and the BTL model are identical. We bound the finite sample error rates between the scores assumed by the BTL model and those estimated by our algorithm. In particular, the number of samples required to learn the score well with high probability depends on the structure of the comparison graph. When the Laplacian of the comparison graph has a strictly positive spectral gap, e.g., each item is compared to a subset of randomly chosen items, this leads to dependence on the number of samples that is nearly order optimal. Experimental evaluations on synthetic data sets generated according to the BTL model show that our algorithm performs as well as the maximum likelihood estimator for that model and outperforms other popular ranking algorithms.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1534en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titleRank Centrality: Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNegahban, Sahand, Sewoong Oh, and Devavrat Shah. “Rank Centrality: Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons.” Operations Research 65, 1 (February 2017): 266–287 © 2017 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systemsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorShah, Devavrat
dc.relation.journalOperations Researchen_US
dc.eprint.versionOriginal manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsNegahban, Sahand; Oh, Sewoong; Shah, Devavraten_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0737-3259
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record