MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention?

Author(s)
Rubio-Fernandez, Paula
Thumbnail
Download13423_2016_1190_ReferencePDF.pdf (466.4Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY

Publisher Policy

Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.

Terms of use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Over two decades, the director task has increasingly been employed as a test of the use of Theory of Mind in communication, first in psycholinguistics and more recently in social cognition research. A new version of this task was designed to test two independent hypotheses. First, optimal performance in the director task, as established by the standard metrics of interference, is possible by using selective attention alone, and not necessarily Theory of Mind. Second, pragmatic measures of Theory-of-Mind use can reveal that people actively represent the director’s mental states, contrary to recent claims that they only use domain-general cognitive processes to perform this task. The results of this study support both hypotheses and provide a new interactive paradigm to reliably test Theory-of-Mind use in referential communication.
Date issued
2016-11
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111058
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Journal
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Publisher
Psychonomic Society
Citation
Rubio-Fernández, Paula. “The Director Task: A Test of Theory-of-Mind Use or Selective Attention?” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24, 4 (November 7, 2016): 1121–1128 © 2016 Psychonomic Society, Inc
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
1069-9384
1531-5320

Collections
  • MIT Open Access Articles

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.