Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMangiarotti, Franco Julio
dc.contributor.authorMinervini, Joseph V
dc.contributor.authorFreidberg, Jeffrey P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T17:50:56Z
dc.date.available2017-09-14T17:50:56Z
dc.date.issued2015-07
dc.date.submitted2015-01
dc.identifier.issn1070-664X
dc.identifier.issn1089-7674
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111207
dc.description.abstractThis paper attempts to bridge the gap between tokamak reactor design and plasma physics. The analysis demonstrates that the overall design of a tokamak fusion reactor is determined almost entirely by the constraints imposed by nuclear physics and fusion engineering. Virtually, no plasma physics is required to determine the main design parameters of a reactor: a, R[subscript 0], B[subscript 0], T[subscript i], T[subscript e], p, n, τ[subscript E], I. The one exception is the value of the toroidal current I, which depends upon a combination of engineering and plasma physics. This exception, however, ultimately has a major impact on the feasibility of an attractive tokamak reactor. The analysis shows that the engineering/nuclear physics design makes demands on the plasma physics that must be satisfied in order to generate power. These demands are substituted into the well-known operational constraints arising in tokamak physics: the Troyon limit, Greenwald limit, kink stability limit, and bootstrap fraction limit. Unfortunately, a tokamak reactor designed on the basis of standard engineering and nuclear physics constraints does not scale to a reactor. Too much current is required to achieve the necessary confinement time for ignition. The combination of achievable bootstrap current plus current drive is not sufficient to generate the current demanded by the engineering design. Several possible solutions are discussed in detail involving advances in plasma physics or engineering. The main contribution of the present work is to demonstrate that the basic reactor design and its plasma physics consequences can be determined simply and analytically. The analysis thus provides a crisp, compact, logical framework that will hopefully lead to improved physical intuition for connecting plasma physic to tokamak reactor design.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Department of Energy (Grant DE-FG02-91ER54109)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Department of Energy (Grant DE-FC02-93ER54186)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Physics (AIP)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4923266en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceMIT Plasma Science & Fusion Centeren_US
dc.titleDesigning a tokamak fusion reactor—How does plasma physics fit in?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationFreidberg, J. P. et al. “Designing a Tokamak Fusion reactor—How Does Plasma Physics Fit In?” Physics of Plasmas 22, 7 (July 2015): 070901 © 2015 AIP Publishingen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Plasma Science and Fusion Centeren_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFreidberg, Jeffrey P
dc.contributor.mitauthorMangiarotti, Franco Julio
dc.contributor.mitauthorMinervini, Joseph V
dc.relation.journalPhysics of Plasmasen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsFreidberg, J. P.; Mangiarotti, F. J.; Minervini, J.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7132-5916
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0594-3350
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record