Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVanli, Nuri Denizcan
dc.contributor.authorGurbuzbalaban, Mert
dc.contributor.authorKoksal, Asuman E.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-04T15:08:51Z
dc.date.available2017-10-04T15:08:51Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-5090-1837-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111781
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the proximal incremental aggregated gradient (PIAG) method for minimizing the sum of a large number of smooth component functions f(x) = Σ[subscript i=1]m f[subscript i](x) and a convex function r(x). Such composite optimization problems arise in a number of machine learning applications including regularized regression problems and constrained distributed optimization problems over sensor networks. Our method computes an approximate gradient for the function f(x) by aggregating the component gradients evaluated at outdated iterates over a finite window K and uses a proximal operator with respect to the regularization function r(x) at the intermediate iterate obtained by moving along the approximate gradient. Under the assumptions that f(x) is strongly convex and each f[subscript i](x) is smooth with Lipschitz gradients, we show the first linear convergence rate result for the PIAG method and provide explicit convergence rate estimates that highlight the dependence on the condition number of the problem and the size of the window K over which outdated component gradients are evaluated.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2016.7798265en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titleGlobal convergence rate of incremental aggregated gradient methods for nonsmooth problemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationVanli, N. Denizcan et al. “Global Convergence Rate of Incremental Aggregated Gradient Methods for Nonsmooth Problems.” 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), December 12-14 2016, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), December 2016: 173-178 © 2016 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systemsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorVanli, Nuri Denizcan
dc.contributor.mitauthorGurbuzbalaban, Mert
dc.contributor.mitauthorKoksal, Asuman E.
dc.relation.journal2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)en_US
dc.eprint.versionOriginal manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsVanli, N. Denizcan; Gurbuzbalaban, Mert; Ozdaglar, Asumanen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0575-2450
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1827-1285
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record