Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGeiser, Eveline
dc.contributor.authorHufnagel, Stefanie S
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-09T17:56:33Z
dc.date.available2017-11-09T17:56:33Z
dc.date.issued2011-10
dc.identifier.issn0001-4966
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/112155
dc.description.abstractSpeech rhythm is of crucial importance for correct speech perception and language learning; for example, the specific rhythm is among the first things infants learn about their native language (Ramus, 2000). This study aimed to investigate the importance of speech rhythm in second language learning. German pseudosentences were presented to subjects in two conditions: spoken with a normal conversational speech rhythm versus with a speech rhythm containing a temporally regular beat. Nine native English speakers with 3.5±1.6 years of German training repeated each sentence after hearing it once over headphones. Responses were transcribed using to the IPA and analyzed for the number of correct, false, and missing consonants, as well as for consonant intrusions. The over-all number of correct reproductions of consonants did not differ between the two experimental conditions. However, the experimental condition comprising a normal conversational speech rhythm resulted in significantly fewer consonant intrusions than the condition containing a beat. These results highlight the importance of speech rhythm in language perception/production and suggest, in particular, that second language learning may be facilitated by language-specific temporal grouping.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAcoustical Society of America (ASA)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1121/1.3655289en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleTemporal regularity in speech perception: Is regularity beneficial or deleterious?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationGeiser, Eveline and Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie“Temporal Regularity in Speech Perception: Is Regularity Beneficial or Deleterious?” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130, 4 (October 2011): 2568–2568en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronicsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMcGovern Institute for Brain Research at MITen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorGeiser, Eveline
dc.contributor.mitauthorHufnagel, Stefanie S
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of Americaen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsGeiser, Eveline; Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanieen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-7872
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0991-5541
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record