Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDennett, Daniel C.
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Michael
dc.contributor.authorKanwisher, Nancy
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-14T19:30:01Z
dc.date.available2017-11-14T19:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.identifier.issn1364-6613
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/112190
dc.description.abstractAlthough our subjective impression is of a richly detailed visual world, numerous empirical results suggest that the amount of visual information observers can perceive and remember at any given moment is limited. How can our subjective impressions be reconciled with these objective observations? Here, we answer this question by arguing that, although we see more than the handful of objects, claimed by prominent models of visual attention and working memory, we still see far less than we think we do. Taken together, we argue that these considerations resolve the apparent conflict between our subjective impressions and empirical data on visual capacity, while also illuminating the nature of the representations underlying perceptual experience. Numerous empirical results highlight the limits of visual perception, attention, and working memory. However, it intuitively feels as though we have a rich perceptual experience, leading many to claim that conscious perception overflows these limited cognitive mechanisms.A relatively new field of study (visual ensembles and summary statistics) provides empirical support for the notion that perception is not limited and that observers have access to information across the entire visual world.Ensemble statistics, and scene processing in general, also appear to be supported by neural structures that are distinct from those supporting object perception. These distinct mechanisms can work partially in parallel, providing observers with a broad perceptual experience.Moreover, new demonstrations show that perception is not as rich as is intuitively believed. Thus, ensemble statistics appear to capture the entirety of perceptual experience.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.). Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (F32EY024483)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant EY13455)en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.TICS.2016.03.006en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleWhat is the Bandwidth of Perceptual Experience?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationCohen, Michael A. et al. “What Is the Bandwidth of Perceptual Experience?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20, 5 (May 2016): 324–335 © 2016 Elsevier Ltden_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMcGovern Institute for Brain Research at MITen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorCohen, Michael
dc.contributor.mitauthorKanwisher, Nancy
dc.relation.journalTrends in Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2017-11-13T20:26:29Z
dspace.orderedauthorsCohen, Michael A.; Dennett, Daniel C.; Kanwisher, Nancyen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1492-9286
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3853-7885
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record