Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStaziaki, Pedro Vinícius
dc.contributor.authorGhoshhajra, Brian
dc.contributor.authorBhatt, Ami B.
dc.contributor.authorKeshavarz Motamed, Zahra
dc.contributor.authorRikhtegar Nezami, Farhad
dc.contributor.authorPartida, Ramon
dc.contributor.authorNakamura, Kenta
dc.contributor.authorBen Assa, Eyal Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorEdelman, Elazer R
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-14T21:01:33Z
dc.date.available2017-12-14T21:01:33Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.date.submitted2016-06
dc.identifier.issn1936-8798
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/112766
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study sought to investigate the impact of transcatheter intervention on left ventricular function and aortic hemodynamics in patients with mild coarctation of the aorta (COA). Background: The optimal method and timing of transcatheter intervention for COA remains unclear, especially when the severity of COA is mild (peak-to-peak transcoarctation pressure gradient  < 20 mm Hg). Debate rages regarding the risk/benefit ratio of intervention versus long-term effects of persistent minimal gradient in this heterogeneous population with differing blood pressures, ventricular function, and peripheral perfusion. Methods: We developed a unique computational fluid dynamics and lumped parameter modeling framework based on patient-specific hemodynamic input parameters and validated it against patient-specific clinical outcomes (before and after intervention). We used clinically measured hemodynamic metrics and imaging of the aorta and the left ventricle in 34 patients with mild COA to make these correlations. Results: Despite dramatic reduction in the transcoarctation pressure gradient (catheter and Doppler echocardiography pressure gradients reduced by 75% and 47.3%, respectively), there was only modest effect on aortic flow and no significant impact on aortic shear stress (the maximum time-averaged wall shear stress in descending aorta was reduced 5.1%). In no patient did transcatheter intervention improve left ventricular function (e.g., stroke work and normalized stroke work were reduced by only 4.48% and 3.9%, respectively). Conclusions: Transcatheter intervention that successfully relieves mild COA pressure gradients does not translate to decreased myocardial strain. The effects of the intervention were determined to the greatest degree by ventricular–vascular coupling hemodynamics and provide a novel valuable mechanism to evaluate patients with COA that may influence clinical practice. Key Words: aortic hemodynamics, left ventricle function, mild coarctation, peak-to-peak pressure gradient, transcatheter interventionen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) (R01 GM 49039)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAmerican Heart Association (Postdoctoral Fellowship 16POST26420039)en_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.JCIN.2016.06.054en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleElimination of Transcoarctation Pressure Gradients Has No Impact on Left Ventricular Function or Aortic Shear Stress After Intervention in Patients With Mild Coarctationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationKeshavarz-Motamed, Zahra, et al. “Elimination of Transcoarctation Pressure Gradients Has No Impact on Left Ventricular Function or Aortic Shear Stress After Intervention in Patients With Mild Coarctation.” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 9, no. 18, Sept. 2016, pp. 1953–65.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorKeshavarz Motamed, Zahra
dc.contributor.mitauthorRikhtegar Nezami, Farhad
dc.contributor.mitauthorPartida, Ramon
dc.contributor.mitauthorNakamura, Kenta
dc.contributor.mitauthorBen Assa, Eyal Benjamin
dc.contributor.mitauthorEdelman, Elazer R
dc.relation.journalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventionsen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2017-12-14T18:50:17Z
dspace.orderedauthorsKeshavarz-Motamed, Zahra; Rikhtegar Nezami, Farhad; Partida, Ramon A.; Nakamura, Kenta; Staziaki, Pedro Vinícius; Ben-Assa, Eyal; Ghoshhajra, Brian; Bhatt, Ami B.; Edelman, Elazer R.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5853-3887
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4210-3177
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8424-8040
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9209-597X
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9129-7000
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7832-7156
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record