Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDautriche, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorPiantadosi, Steven T.
dc.contributor.authorMahowald, Kyle Adam
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Edward A
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-08T19:26:23Z
dc.date.available2018-01-08T19:26:23Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.date.submitted2016-09
dc.identifier.issn0364-0213
dc.identifier.issn1551-6709
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113025
dc.description.abstractAlthough the mapping between form and meaning is often regarded as arbitrary, there are in fact well-known constraints on words which are the result of functional pressures associated with language use and its acquisition. In particular, languages have been shown to encode meaning distinctions in their sound properties, which may be important for language learning. Here, we investigate the relationship between semantic distance and phonological distance in the large-scale structure of the lexicon. We show evidence in 100 languages from a diverse array of language families that more semantically similar word pairs are also more phonologically similar. This suggests that there is an important statistical trend for lexicons to have semantically similar words be phonologically similar as well, possibly for functional reasons associated with language learning.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.) (Grant F32HD070544)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12453en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Gibson via Courtney Crummetten_US
dc.titleWordform Similarity Increases With Semantic Similarity: An Analysis of 100 Languagesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationDautriche, Isabelle et al. “Wordform Similarity Increases With Semantic Similarity: An Analysis of 100 Languages.” Cognitive Science 41, 8 (November 2016): 2149–2169 © 2016 Cognitive Science Society, Incen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.approverGibson, Edwarden_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorMahowald, Kyle Adam
dc.contributor.mitauthorGibson, Edward A
dc.relation.journalCognitive Scienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsDautriche, Isabelle; Mahowald, Kyle; Gibson, Edward; Piantadosi, Steven T.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-8716
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record