Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHickey, Tina
dc.contributor.authorLee, Aldrin
dc.contributor.authorLim, Eunice
dc.contributor.authorLuchkina, Elena
dc.contributor.authorFutrell, Richard Landy Jones
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Edward A
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-10T19:14:29Z
dc.date.available2018-01-10T19:14:29Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.date.submitted2014-11
dc.identifier.issn0010-0277
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113049
dc.description.abstractIn communicating events by gesture, participants create codes that recapitulate the patterns of word order in the world’s vocal languages (Gibson et al., 2013; Goldin-Meadow, So, Ozyurek, & Mylander, 2008; Hall, Mayberry, & Ferreria, 2013; Hall, Ferreira, & Mayberry, 2014; Langus & Nespor, 2010; and others). Participants most often convey simple transitive events using gestures in the order Subject–Object–Verb (SOV), the most common word order in human languages. When there is a possibility of confusion between subject and object, participants use the order Subject–Verb–Object (SVO). This overall pattern has been explained by positing an underlying cognitive preference for subject-initial, verb-final orders, with the verb-medial order SVO order emerging to facilitate robust communication in a noisy channel (Gibson et al., 2013). However, whether the subject-initial and verb-final biases are innate or the result of languages that the participants already know has been unclear, because participants in previous studies all spoke either SVO or SOV languages, which could induce a subject-initial, verb-late bias. Furthermore, the exact manner in which known languages influence gestural orders has been unclear. In this paper we demonstrate that there is a subject-initial and verb-final gesturing bias cross-linguistically by comparing gestures of speakers of SVO languages English and Russian to those of speakers of VSO languages Irish and Tagalog. The findings show that subject-initial and verb-final order emerges even in speakers of verb-initial languages, and that interference from these languages takes the form of occasionally gesturing in VSO order, without an additional bias toward other orders. The results provides further support for the idea that improvised gesture is a window into the pressures shaping language formation, independently of the languages that participants already know. Keywords: Psycholinguistics; Language universals; Language typology; Word order; Gesture; Animacyen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.022en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Gibson via Courtney Crummetten_US
dc.titleCross-linguistic gestures reflect typological universals: A subject-initial, verb-final bias in speakers of diverse languagesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationFutrell, Richard, et al. “Cross-Linguistic Gestures Reflect Typological Universals: A Subject-Initial, Verb-Final Bias in Speakers of Diverse Languages.” Cognition, vol. 136, Mar. 2015, pp. 215–21.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.approverGibson, Edwarden_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFutrell, Richard Landy Jones
dc.contributor.mitauthorGibson, Edward A
dc.relation.journalCognitionen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsFutrell, Richard; Hickey, Tina; Lee, Aldrin; Lim, Eunice; Luchkina, Elena; Gibson, Edwarden_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-6139
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record