Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Persistent and transient cost efficiency—an application to the Swiss hydropower sector

Persistent and transient cost efficiency—an application to the Swiss hydropower sector

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

11123_2017_Article_522.pdf

Size

684.06 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

c3c7d8187edfd919d56d2da6be3df468

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
art_5621183108366186816.zip (380.63 KB)
Author(s)
Filippini, Massimo
•
Geissmann, Thomas
•
Greene, William H.
Date Issued
November 2017
Journal
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Citation
Filippini, Massimo, Thomas Geissmann, and William H. Greene. “Persistent and Transient Cost Efficiency—an Application to the Swiss Hydropower Sector.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 49, no. 1 (November 27, 2017): 65–77.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Abstract Electricity prices on the European market have decreased significantly over the past few years, resulting in a deterioration of Swiss hydropower firms’ competitiveness and profitability. One option to improve the sector’s competitiveness is to increase cost efficiency. The goal of this study is to quantify the level of persistent and transient cost efficiency of individual firms by applying the generalized true random effects (GTRE) model introduced by Colombi et al. (Journal of Productivity Analysis 42(2): 123–136, 2014) and Filippini and Greene (Journal of Productivity Analysis 45(2): 187–196, 2016). Applying this newly developed GTRE model to a total cost function, the level of cost efficiency of 65 Swiss hydropower firms is analyzed for the period between 2000 and 2013. A true random effects specification is estimated as a benchmark for the transient level of cost efficiency. The results show the presence of both transient as well as persistent cost inefficiencies. The GTREM predicts the aggregate level of cost inefficiency to amount to 21.8% (8.0% transient, 13.8% persistent) on average between 2000 and 2013. These two components differ in interpretation and implication. From an individual firm’s perspective, the two types of cost inefficiencies might require a firm’s management to respond with different improvement strategies. The existing level of persistent inefficiency could prevent the hydropower firms from adjusting their production processes to new market environments. From a regulatory point of view, the results of this study could be used in the scope and determination of the amount of financial support given to struggling firms.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Joint Program on the Science & Policy of Global Change
MIT Energy Initiative
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113645
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-017-0522-6
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.