Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBardou, Marc
dc.contributor.authorCrépon, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorBertaux, Anne-Claire
dc.contributor.authorGodard-Marceaux, Aurélie
dc.contributor.authorEckman-Lacroix, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorThellier, Elise
dc.contributor.authorFalchier, Frédérique
dc.contributor.authorDeruelle, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorDoret, Muriel
dc.contributor.authorCarcopino-Tusoli, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorSchmitz, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorBarjat, Thiphaine
dc.contributor.authorMorin, Mathieu
dc.contributor.authorPerrotin, Franck
dc.contributor.authorHatem, Ghada
dc.contributor.authorDeneux-Tharaux, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorFournel, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorLaforet, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorMeunier-Beillard, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorLe Ray, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorDuflo, Esther
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-26T19:43:07Z
dc.date.available2018-02-26T19:43:07Z
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.date.submitted2017-04
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113887
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Prenatal care is recommended during pregnancy to improve neonatal and maternal outcomes. Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) are less compliant to recommended prenatal care and suffer a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Several attempts to encourage optimal pregnancy follow-up have shown controversial results, particularly in high-income countries. Few studies have assessed financial incentives to encourage prenatal care, and none reported materno-fetal events as the primary outcome. Our study aims to determine whether financial incentives could improve pregnancy outcomes in women with low SES in a high-income country. Methods and analysis: This pragmatic cluster-randomised clinical trial includes pregnant women with the following criteria: (1) age above 18 years, (2) first pregnancy visit before 26 weeks of gestation and (3) belonging to a socioeconomically disadvantaged group. The intervention consists in offering financial incentives conditional on attending scheduled pregnancy follow-up consultations. Clusters are 2-month periods with random turnover across centres. A composite outcome of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include maternal or neonatal outcomes assessed separately, qualitative assessment of the perception of the intervention and cost-effectiveness analysis for which children will be followed to the end of their first year through the French health insurance database. The study started in June 2016, and based on an expected decrease in the primary endpoint from 18% to 14% in the intervention group, we plan to include 2000 women in each group. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was first gained on 28 September 2014. An independent data security and monitoring committee has been established. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary analyses will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number: NCT02402855; pre-results.en_US
dc.publisherBMJen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2017-017321en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceBMJen_US
dc.titleNAITRE study on the impact of conditional cash transfer on poor pregnancy outcomes in underprivileged women: protocol for a nationwide pragmatic cluster-randomised superiority clinical trial in Franceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBardou, Marc, et al. “NAITRE Study on the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer on Poor Pregnancy Outcomes in Underprivileged Women: Protocol for a Nationwide Pragmatic Cluster-Randomised Superiority Clinical Trial in France.” BMJ Open, vol. 7, no. 10, Oct. 2017, p. e017321.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economicsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorDuflo, Esther
dc.relation.journalBMJ Openen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-02-21T17:13:40Z
dspace.orderedauthorsBardou, Marc; Crépon, Bruno; Bertaux, Anne-Claire; Godard-Marceaux, Aurélie; Eckman-Lacroix, Astrid; Thellier, Elise; Falchier, Frédérique; Deruelle, Philippe; Doret, Muriel; Carcopino-Tusoli, Xavier; Schmitz, Thomas; Barjat, Thiphaine; Morin, Mathieu; Perrotin, Franck; Hatem, Ghada; Deneux-Tharaux, Catherine; Fournel, Isabelle; Laforet, Laurent; Meunier-Beillard, Nicolas; Duflo, Esther; Le Ray, Isabelleen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6105-617X
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record