Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPolishook, D.
dc.contributor.authorMoskovitz, N.
dc.contributor.authorHinkle, M.L.
dc.contributor.authorLockhart, M.
dc.contributor.authorMommert, M.
dc.contributor.authorThirouin, A.
dc.contributor.authorThomas, C.A.
dc.contributor.authorTrilling, D.
dc.contributor.authorWillman, M.
dc.contributor.authorAharonson, O.
dc.contributor.authorBinzel, Richard P
dc.contributor.authorBurt, Brian
dc.contributor.authorDeMeo, Francesca E
dc.contributor.authorPerson, Michael J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-20T20:17:34Z
dc.date.available2018-04-20T20:17:34Z
dc.date.issued2015-12
dc.date.submitted2015-12
dc.identifier.issn0019-1035
dc.identifier.issn1090-2643
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114833
dc.description.abstractThe rubble pile spin barrier is an upper limit on the rotation rate of asteroids larger than ~200-300. m. Among thousands of asteroids with diameters larger than ~300. m, only a handful of asteroids are known to rotate faster than 2.0. h, all are in the sub-km range (≤0.6. km). Here we present photometric measurements suggesting that (60716) 2000 GD65, an S-complex, inner-main belt asteroid with a relatively large diameter of 2.3-0.7+0.6km, completes one rotation in 1.9529. ±. 0.0002. h. Its unique diameter and rotation period allow us to examine scenarios about asteroid internal structure and evolution: a rubble pile bound only by gravity; a rubble-pile with strong cohesion; a monolithic structure; an asteroid experiencing mass shedding; an asteroid experiencing YORP spin-up/down; and an asteroid with a unique octahedron shape results with a four-peak lightcurve and a 3.9. h period. We find that the most likely scenario includes a lunar-like cohesion that can prevent (60716) 2000 GD65 from disrupting without requiring a monolithic structure or a unique shape. Due to the uniqueness of (60716) 2000 GD65, we suggest that most asteroids typically have smaller cohesion than that of lunar regolith. Keywords: Asteroids; Asteroids, rotation; Rotational dynamics; Photometryen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Grant NNX12AL26G)en_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.ICARUS.2015.12.031en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titleA 2km-size asteroid challenging the rubble-pile spin barrier – A case for cohesionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPolishook, D. et al. “A 2 Km-Size Asteroid Challenging the Rubble-Pile Spin Barrier – A Case for Cohesion.” Icarus 267 (March 2016): 243–254 © 2015 Elsevier Incen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorBinzel, Richard P
dc.contributor.mitauthorBurt, Brian
dc.contributor.mitauthorDeMeo, Francesca E
dc.contributor.mitauthorPerson, Michael J
dc.relation.journalIcarusen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-04-19T18:59:30Z
dspace.orderedauthorsPolishook, D.; Moskovitz, N.; Binzel, R.P.; Burt, B.; DeMeo, F.E.; Hinkle, M.L.; Lockhart, M.; Mommert, M.; Person, M.; Thirouin, A.; Thomas, C.A.; Trilling, D.; Willman, M.; Aharonson, O.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0000-0572
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record