dc.contributor.author | Polishook, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Moskovitz, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hinkle, M.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lockhart, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mommert, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Thirouin, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, C.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Trilling, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Willman, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Aharonson, O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Binzel, Richard P | |
dc.contributor.author | Burt, Brian | |
dc.contributor.author | DeMeo, Francesca E | |
dc.contributor.author | Person, Michael J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-20T20:17:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-20T20:17:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-12 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-12 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0019-1035 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1090-2643 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114833 | |
dc.description.abstract | The rubble pile spin barrier is an upper limit on the rotation rate of asteroids larger than ~200-300. m. Among thousands of asteroids with diameters larger than ~300. m, only a handful of asteroids are known to rotate faster than 2.0. h, all are in the sub-km range (≤0.6. km). Here we present photometric measurements suggesting that (60716) 2000 GD65, an S-complex, inner-main belt asteroid with a relatively large diameter of 2.3-0.7+0.6km, completes one rotation in 1.9529. ±. 0.0002. h. Its unique diameter and rotation period allow us to examine scenarios about asteroid internal structure and evolution: a rubble pile bound only by gravity; a rubble-pile with strong cohesion; a monolithic structure; an asteroid experiencing mass shedding; an asteroid experiencing YORP spin-up/down; and an asteroid with a unique octahedron shape results with a four-peak lightcurve and a 3.9. h period. We find that the most likely scenario includes a lunar-like cohesion that can prevent (60716) 2000 GD65 from disrupting without requiring a monolithic structure or a unique shape. Due to the uniqueness of (60716) 2000 GD65, we suggest that most asteroids typically have smaller cohesion than that of lunar regolith. Keywords: Asteroids; Asteroids, rotation; Rotational dynamics; Photometry | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Grant NNX12AL26G) | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.ICARUS.2015.12.031 | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.source | arXiv | en_US |
dc.title | A 2km-size asteroid challenging the rubble-pile spin barrier – A case for cohesion | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Polishook, D. et al. “A 2 Km-Size Asteroid Challenging the Rubble-Pile Spin Barrier – A Case for Cohesion.” Icarus 267 (March 2016): 243–254 © 2015 Elsevier Inc | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences | en_US |
dc.contributor.mitauthor | Binzel, Richard P | |
dc.contributor.mitauthor | Burt, Brian | |
dc.contributor.mitauthor | DeMeo, Francesca E | |
dc.contributor.mitauthor | Person, Michael J | |
dc.relation.journal | Icarus | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | en_US |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
dc.date.updated | 2018-04-19T18:59:30Z | |
dspace.orderedauthors | Polishook, D.; Moskovitz, N.; Binzel, R.P.; Burt, B.; DeMeo, F.E.; Hinkle, M.L.; Lockhart, M.; Mommert, M.; Person, M.; Thirouin, A.; Thomas, C.A.; Trilling, D.; Willman, M.; Aharonson, O. | en_US |
dspace.embargo.terms | N | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0000-0572 | |
mit.license | PUBLISHER_CC | en_US |