Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWallace, Lisa M. M.
dc.contributor.authorHagan, David Henry
dc.contributor.authorIsaacman, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorFranklin, Jonathan Pfeil
dc.contributor.authorKocar, Benjamin David
dc.contributor.authorHeald, Colette L.
dc.contributor.authorKroll, Jesse
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-26T19:27:08Z
dc.date.available2018-04-26T19:27:08Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.date.submitted2017-11
dc.identifier.issn1867-8548
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114971
dc.description.abstractThe use of low-cost air quality sensors for air pollution research has outpaced our understanding of their capabilities and limitations under real-world conditions, and there is thus a critical need for understanding and optimizing the performance of such sensors in the field. Here we describe the deployment, calibration, and evaluation of electrochemical sensors on the island of Hawai'i, which is an ideal test bed for characterizing such sensors due to its large and variable sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) levels and lack of other co-pollutants. Nine custom-built SO 2 sensors were co-located with two Hawaii Department of Health Air Quality stations over the course of 5 months, enabling comparison of sensor output with regulatory-grade instruments under a range of realistic environmental conditions. Calibration using a nonparametric algorithm (k nearest neighbors) was found to have excellent performance (RMSE < 7ppb, MAE < 4ppb, r2 > 0.997) across a wide dynamic range in SO 2 ( < 1ppb, > 2ppm). However, since nonparametric algorithms generally cannot extrapolate to conditions beyond those outside the training set, we introduce a new hybrid linear-nonparametric algorithm, enabling accurate measurements even when pollutant levels are higher than encountered during calibration. We find no significant change in instrument sensitivity toward SO 2 after 18 weeks and demonstrate that calibration accuracy remains high when a sensor is calibrated at one location and then moved to another. The performance of electrochemical SO 2 sensors is also strong at lower SO 2 mixing ratios ( < 25ppb), for which they exhibit an error of less than 2.5ppb. While some specific results of this study (calibration accuracy, performance of the various algorithms, etc.) may differ for measurements of other pollutant species in other areas (e.g., polluted urban regions), the calibration and validation approaches described here should be widely applicable to a range of pollutants, sensors, and environments.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Environmental Protection Agency (Grant RD-83618301)en_US
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbHen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-315-2018en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.titleCalibration and assessment of electrochemical air quality sensors by co-location with regulatory-grade instrumentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHagan, David H. et al.“Calibration and Assessment of Electrochemical Air Quality Sensors by Co-Location with Regulatory-Grade Instruments.” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 11, 1 (January 2018): 315–328 © 2018 Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHagan, David Henry
dc.contributor.mitauthorIsaacman, Gabriel
dc.contributor.mitauthorFranklin, Jonathan Pfeil
dc.contributor.mitauthorKocar, Benjamin David
dc.contributor.mitauthorHeald, Colette L.
dc.contributor.mitauthorKroll, Jesse
dc.relation.journalAtmospheric Measurement Techniquesen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-04-24T14:16:53Z
dspace.orderedauthorsHagan, David H.; Isaacman-VanWertz, Gabriel; Franklin, Jonathan P.; Wallace, Lisa M. M.; Kocar, Benjamin D.; Heald, Colette L.; Kroll, Jesse H.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5111-4671
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8352-5854
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2894-5738
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-521X
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record