Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrošelj, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCerri, Silvio S.
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, Alejandro Bañón
dc.contributor.authorTold, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCalifano, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorJenko, Frank
dc.contributor.authorWillmott, Christopher Edward
dc.contributor.authorLoureiro, Nuno F.
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-01T19:03:34Z
dc.date.available2018-05-01T19:03:34Z
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.date.submitted2017-06
dc.identifier.issn1538-4357
dc.identifier.issn0004-637X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115143
dc.description.abstractWe report the results of a direct comparison between different kinetic models of collisionless plasma turbulence in two spatial dimensions. The models considered include a first-principles fully kinetic (FK) description, two widely used reduced models (gyrokinetic (GK) and hybrid-kinetic (HK) with fluid electrons), and a novel reduced gyrokinetic approach (KREHM). Two different ion (beta[subscript i]) regimes are considered: 0.1 and 0.5. For (beta[subscript i]) = 0.5, good agreement between the GK and FK models is found at scales ranging from the ion to the electron gyroradius, thus providing firm evidence for a kinetic Alfvén cascade scenario. In the same range, the HK model produces shallower spectral slopes, presumably due to the lack of electron Landau damping. For (beta[subscript i]) = 0.1, a detailed analysis of spectral ratios reveals a slight disagreement between the GK and FK descriptions at kinetic scales, even though kinetic Alfvén fluctuations likely still play a significant role. The discrepancy can be traced back to scales above the ion gyroradius, where the FK and HK results seem to suggest the presence of fast magnetosonic and ion Bernstein modes in both plasma beta regimes, but with a more notable deviation from GK in the low-beta case. The identified practical limits and strengths of reduced-kinetic approximations, compared here against the FK model on a case-by-case basis, may provide valuable insight into the main kinetic effects at play in turbulent collisionless plasmas, such as the solar wind.en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/AA894Den_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceIOP Publishingen_US
dc.titleFully Kinetic versus Reduced-kinetic Modeling of Collisionless Plasma Turbulenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationGrošelj, Daniel et al. “Fully Kinetic Versus Reduced-Kinetic Modeling of Collisionless Plasma Turbulence.” The Astrophysical Journal 847, 1 (September 2017): 28 © 2017 The American Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Plasma Science and Fusion Centeren_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorWillmott, Christopher Edward
dc.contributor.mitauthorLoureiro, Nuno F.
dc.relation.journalAstrophysical Journalen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-04-24T14:57:51Z
dspace.orderedauthorsGrošelj, Daniel; Cerri, Silvio S.; Navarro, Alejandro Bañón; Willmott, Christopher; Told, Daniel; Loureiro, Nuno F.; Califano, Francesco; Jenko, Franken_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record