Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuh, Eun Suk
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Kaushik
dc.contributor.authorDe Weck, Olivier L
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-02T16:57:44Z
dc.date.available2018-05-02T16:57:44Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.identifier.issn1050-0472
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115169
dc.description.abstractComplexity and modularity are important inherent properties of the system. Complexity is the property of the system that has to do with individual system elements and their connective relationship, while modularity is the degree to which a system is made up of relatively independent but interacting elements, with each module typically carrying an isolated set of functionality. Modularization is not necessarily a means of reducing intrinsic complexity of the system but is a mechanism for complexity redistribution that can be better managed by enabling design encapsulation. In this paper, the notion of integrative complexity (IC) is proposed, and the corresponding metric is proposed as an alternative metric for modularity from a complexity management viewpoint. It is also demonstrated using several engineered systems from different application d omains that there is a strong negative correlation between the IC and system modularity. This leads to the conclusion that the IC can be used as an alternative metric for modularity assessment of system architectures.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKorea (South). Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (National Research Foundation of Korea. Grant NRF2016R1D1A1A09916273)en_US
dc.publisherASME Internationalen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4039119en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceASMEen_US
dc.titleIntegrative Complexity: An Alternative Measure for System Modularityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSinha, Kaushik, et al. “Integrative Complexity: An Alternative Measure for System Modularity.” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 140, no. 5, Mar. 2018, p. 051101. © 2018 by ASMEen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Sociotechnical Systems Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSinha, Kaushik
dc.contributor.mitauthorDe Weck, Olivier L
dc.relation.journalJournal of Mechanical Designen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-03-19T18:03:04Z
dspace.orderedauthorsSinha, Kaushik; Suh, Eun Suk; de Weck, Olivieren_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6677-383X
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record