Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, Kian
dc.contributor.authorNorford, Leslie Keith
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T19:07:39Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T19:07:39Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.date.submitted2017-05
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115225
dc.description.abstractWe introduce five performance indicators to facilitate the comparison of urban massingdesign in the early design stages. The five simple indicators are based on existing studies andcover three main performance areas that are sensitive to urban form changes: solar, ventilation,and connectivity potentials. The first three indicators-the non-solar heated façade to floor areaindex, daylight façade to floor area index, and photovoltaics envelope to floor area index-measurethe solar potential. The frontal area index measures the ventilation potential and the route-directnessindex measures the connectivity potential. The indicators are simple to use, as they only requireurban geometry data for their calculation. We demonstrate the indicators in two case studies;variations in the values of these indicators show that they are sensitive to urban form changesand can be used in comparative studies to identify better performing urban forms among massingdesigns. We implement the indicators as an open-source Python library, Pyliburo, that designers andresearchers can readily access and integrate into their existing design workflows. Keywords:performance-based urban design; performance indicators; connectivity; urban ventilation; solar analysisen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/SU9060987en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMDPIen_US
dc.titleEvaluating Urban Forms for Comparison Studies in the Massing Design Stageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationChen, Kian and Leslie Norford. “Evaluating Urban Forms for Comparison Studies in the Massing Design Stage.” Sustainability 9, 6 (June 2017): 987 © 2017 Authorsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architectureen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorNorford, Leslie Keith
dc.relation.journalSustainabilityen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-05-01T18:24:42Z
dspace.orderedauthorsChen, Kian; Norford, Leslieen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5631-7256
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record