Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWarsinger, David Elan Martin
dc.contributor.authorSwaminathan, Jaichander
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Lucien L.
dc.contributor.authorLienhard, John H.
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-09T18:42:02Z
dc.date.available2018-05-09T18:42:02Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.date.submitted2018-02
dc.identifier.issn0376-7388
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115268
dc.description.abstractThe thermal performance of air gap membrane distillation (AGMD) desalination is dominated by heat and mass transfer across the air gap between the membrane and the condensing surface. However, little is known about the impact of condensate flow patterns in some design variations of the air gap. In this study, air gap membrane distillation experiments were performed at various inlet temperatures, varying module inclination angle, condensing surface hydrophobicity, and gap spacer design to identify the effect of each on the permeate production rate and thermal efficiency of the system. Additionally, this study is one of the first with enhanced visualization of flow patterns within the air gap itself, by using a transparent, high thermal conductivity sapphire plate as the condenser surface. System-level numerical modeling is used to further understand the impact of these flow regimes on overall energy efficiency, including flux and GOR. A brief review of membrane distillation condensation regimes is provided as well. For tilting the AGMD flat-plate module, permeate flux was barely influenced except at extreme positive angles ( > 80°), and moderate negative angles ( < −30°), where condensate fell onto the membrane surface. The surface with the hydrophobic coating (for dropwise condensation) was shown to have better droplet shedding (with very small nearly spherical droplets) and fewer droplets bridging the gap. Superhydrophobic surfaces (for jumping droplet condensation) were similar, with much smaller droplet sizes. Such surfaces could improve AGMD efficiency while avoiding flooding, as better performance (2x higher GOR) is reached with much smaller gap sizes ( < 0.2 mm) than currently attainable gaps with filmwise condensation ( > 1 mm). Meanwhile, the hydrophilic surface for small gap sizes ( < 3 mm) often had pinned regions of water around the hydrophilic surface and plastic spacer. Overall, the various results imply that the common assumption of a laminar condensate film poorly describes the flow patterns in real systems for all tilt angles and most spacer designs. Real system performance is likely to be between that of pure AGMD and permeate gap membrane distillation (PGMD) variants, and modeling shows that enhanced condensing in air gaps may improve system energy efficiency significantly, with strong relative advantages at high salinity. Keywords: Membrane distillation; Hydrophobic surface; Air gap; Condensation; Visualizationen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.053en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Lienharden_US
dc.titleComprehensive condensation flow regimes in air gap membrane distillation: Visualization and energy efficiencyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationWarsinger, David M. et al. “Comprehensive Condensation Flow Regimes in Air Gap Membrane Distillation: Visualization and Energy Efficiency.” Journal of Membrane Science 555 (June 2018): 517–528 © 2018 Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorWarsinger, David Elan Martin
dc.contributor.mitauthorSwaminathan, Jaichander
dc.contributor.mitauthorMorales, Lucien L.
dc.contributor.mitauthorLienhard, John H.
dc.relation.journalJournal of Membrane Scienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-04-30T18:49:09Z
dspace.orderedauthorsWarsinger, David M.; Swaminathan, Jaichander; Morales, Lucien L.; Lienhard V, John H.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1473
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-2694
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-0638
dspace.mitauthor.errortrue
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record