| dc.contributor.author | Linnebo, O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rayo Fierro, Agustin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-14T13:55:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-05-14T13:55:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-05 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0026-4423 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1460-2113 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115353 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Florio and Shapiro take issue with an argument in ‘Hierarchies Ontological and Ideological’ for the conclusion that the set-theoretic hierarchy is open-ended. Here we clarify and reinforce the argument in light of their concerns. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/MIND/FZU052 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.source | MIT Web Domain | en_US |
| dc.title | Reply to Florio and Shapiro | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Linnebo, O., and A. Rayo. “Reply to Florio and Shapiro.” Mind 123, 489 (January 2014): 175–181 © 2014 Linnebo and Rayo | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.contributor.mitauthor | Rayo Fierro, Agustin | |
| dc.relation.journal | Mind | en_US |
| dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | en_US |
| dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
| eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
| dc.date.updated | 2018-05-11T18:22:55Z | |
| dspace.orderedauthors | Linnebo, O.; Rayo, A. | en_US |
| dspace.embargo.terms | N | en_US |
| dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1847-2770 | |
| mit.license | OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY | en_US |
