dc.contributor.author | Skow, Bradford | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-14T14:20:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-14T14:20:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-11 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2638 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1467-8284 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115356 | |
dc.description.abstract | I don’t like sports, but it is a sports metaphor that comes to mind: if my team were out of the playoffs, I’d be rooting for Cameron. Unlike Cameron, I think that The Block Universe Theory of Time is true, but like Cameron I’ve argued that the best alternative, the theory it should be squaring off against in the World Series of The Philosophy of Time, is The Moving Spotlight Theory. I came to Cameron’s book, therefore, curious about how his argument for this claim was going to go. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ANALYS/ANX100 | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.source | MIT Web Domain | en_US |
dc.title | Some Questions about The Moving Spotlight | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Skow, Bradford. “Some Questions About The Moving Spotlight.” Analysis 77, 4 (October 2017): 800–810 © 2017 The Author | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy | en_US |
dc.contributor.mitauthor | Skow, Bradford | |
dc.relation.journal | Analysis | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | en_US |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
dc.date.updated | 2018-05-14T13:02:08Z | |
dspace.orderedauthors | Skow, Bradford | en_US |
dspace.embargo.terms | N | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540 | |
mit.license | OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY | en_US |