Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkow, Bradford
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-16T14:04:11Z
dc.date.available2018-05-16T14:04:11Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.issn0014-1704
dc.identifier.issn1539-297X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115387
dc.description.abstractOther things being equal, people ought to get what they deserve. If there is such a thing as common sense, this claim is part of it. But life is complicated, and this claim does not get us very far. Suppose I could give A what he deserves or give B what she deserves, but not both; what should I do? For Shelly Kagan this question lies on the known edge of a huge expanse of unexplored philosophical terrain. The Geometry of Desert is Kagan’s report on what he found there.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086/673429en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceUniversity of Chicago Pressen_US
dc.titleKagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Deserten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSkow, Bradford. “Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Pp. Xviii+656. $74.00 (cloth).” Ethics 124, no. 2 (January 2014): 417–426.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSkow, Bradford
dc.relation.journalEthicsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-05-14T12:12:21Z
dspace.orderedauthorsSkow, Bradforden_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record