Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, Xuan
dc.contributor.authorHeald, Colette L.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jiumeng
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Rodney J.
dc.contributor.authorCampuzano-Jost, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorJimenez, Jose L.
dc.contributor.authorSchwarz, Joshua P.
dc.contributor.authorPerring, Anne E.
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-16T18:53:31Z
dc.date.available2018-05-16T18:53:31Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.date.submitted2017-11
dc.identifier.issn1680-7375
dc.identifier.issn1680-7367
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115412
dc.description.abstractOrganic aerosols (OA) that strongly absorb solar radiation in the near-UV are referred to as brown carbon (BrC). The sources, evolution, and optical properties of BrC remain highly uncertain and contribute significantly to uncertainty in the estimate of the global direct radiative effect (DRE) of aerosols. Previous modeling studies of BrC optical properties and DRE have been unable to fully evaluate model performance due to the lack of direct measurements of BrC absorption. In this study, we develop a global model simulation (GEOS-Chem) of BrC and test it against BrC absorption measurements from two aircraft campaigns in the continental US (SEAC⁴RS and DC3). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare simulated BrC absorption with direct aircraft measurements. We show that BrC absorption properties estimated based on previous laboratory measurements agree with the aircraft measurements of freshly emitted BrC absorption but overestimate aged BrC absorption. In addition, applying a photochemical scheme to simulate bleaching/degradation of BrC improves model skill. The airborne observations are therefore consistent with a mass absorption coefficient (MAC) of freshly emitted biomass burning OA of 1.33 m2 g⁻¹ at 365 nm coupled with a 1-day whitening e-folding time. Using the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model integrated with the RRTMG radiative transfer model, we estimate that the top-of-the-atmosphere all-sky direct radiative effect (DRE) of OA is −0.344 Wm⁻², 10 % higher than that without consideration of BrC absorption. Therefore, our best estimate of the absorption DRE of BrC is +0.048 Wm⁻². We suggest that the DRE of BrC has been overestimated previously due to the lack of observational constraints from direct measurements and omission of the effects of photochemical whitening.en_US
dc.publisherCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5194/ACP-2017-655en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.titleExploring the observational constraints on the simulation of brown carbonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationWang, Xuan et al. “Exploring the Observational Constraints on the Simulation of Brown Carbon.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions (July 2017): 1–36 © 2018 Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorWang, Xuan
dc.contributor.mitauthorHeald, Colette L.
dc.relation.journalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussionsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-05-04T17:57:21Z
dspace.orderedauthorsWang, Xuan; Heald, Colette L.; Liu, Jiumeng; Weber, Rodney J.; Campuzano-Jost, Pedro; Jimenez, Jose L.; Schwarz, Joshua P.; Perring, Anne E.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8532-5773
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2894-5738
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record