Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShankaran, Sriram
dc.contributor.authorMarta, Andre
dc.contributor.authorVenugopalan, Premnath
dc.contributor.authorBarry, Brian J.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qiqi
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T17:03:21Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T17:03:21Z
dc.date.issued2012-06
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-7918-4474-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/116212
dc.description.abstractWhile the mathematical derivation of the adjoint equations and their numerical implementation is well established, there is a scant discussion on the understanding of the adjoint solution by itself. As this is a field solution of similar resolution of the flow-field, there is a wealth of data that can be used for design guidance. This paper addressess this specific topic. In particular, we take representative cases from turbomachinery aerodynamic problems and use the adjoint solution to identify the "physical insight" it provides. We aim to tie the adjoint solution to the flow-field which has physical properties. Towards this end, we first look at three problems 1) a fan, 2) a compressor rotor and stator, 3) a low pressure turbine. In all three of them, we focus on changes related to geometry, but one can also realize the changes using other inputs to the flow solver (eg. boundary conditions). We show how the adjoint counter-part of the density, the velocity fields and the turbulence quantities can be used to provide insights into the nature of changes the designer can induce to cause improvement in the performance metric of interest. We also discuss how to use adjoint solutions for problems with constraints to further refine the changes. Finally, we use a problem where it is not immediately apparent what geometry changes need to be used for further evaluation with optimization algorithms. In this problem, we use the adjoint and flow solution on a turbine strut, to determine the kind of end-wall treatments that reduce the loss. These changes are then implemented to show that the loss is reduced by close to 8%.en_US
dc.publisherASME Internationalen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1115/GT2012-69588en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceASMEen_US
dc.titleInterpretation of Adjoint Solutions for Turbomachinery Flowsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationShankaran, Sriram, Andre Marta, Prem Venugopal, Brian Barr, and Qiqi Wang. “Interpretation of Adjoint Solutions for Turbomachinery Flows.” Volume 8: Turbomachinery, Parts A, B, and C (June 11, 2012).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Advanced Educational Servicesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorVenugopalan, Premnath
dc.contributor.mitauthorBarry, Brian J.
dc.contributor.mitauthorWang, Qiqi
dc.relation.journalVolume 8: Turbomachinery, Parts A, B, and Cen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-04-12T17:52:59Z
dspace.orderedauthorsShankaran, Sriram; Marta, Andre; Venugopal, Prem; Barr, Brian; Wang, Qiqien_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9669-2563
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record