Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShirvan, Koroush
dc.contributor.authorBuongiorno, Jacopo
dc.contributor.authorForsberg, Charles W
dc.contributor.authorKazimi, Mujid S
dc.contributor.authorTodreas, Neil E
dc.contributor.authorBallinger, Ronald G.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-23T21:09:44Z
dc.date.available2018-07-23T21:09:44Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.date.submitted2016-06
dc.identifier.issn1738-5733
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/117059
dc.description.abstractThis work examines the most viable nuclear technology options for future underwater designs that would meet high safety standards as well as good economic potential, for construction in the 2030–2040 timeframe. The top five concepts selected from a survey of 13 nuclear technologies were compared to a small modular pressurized water reactor (PWR) designed with a conventional layout. In order of smallest to largest primary system size where the reactor and all safety systems are contained, the top five designs were: (1) a lead–bismuth fast reactor based on the Russian SVBR-100; (2) a novel organic cooled reactor; (3) an innovative superheated water reactor; (4) a boiling water reactor based on Toshiba's LSBWR; and (5) an integral PWR featuring compact steam generators. A similar study on potential attractive power cycles was also performed. A condensing and recompression supercritical CO2cycle and a compact steam Rankine cycle were designed. It was found that the hull size required by the reactor, safety systems and power cycle can be significantly reduced (50–80%) with the top five designs compared to the conventional PWR. Based on the qualitative economic consideration, the organic cooled reactor and boiling water reactor designs are expected to be the most cost effective options.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNaval Groupen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.NET.2016.06.002en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceElsevieren_US
dc.titleTechnology Selection for Offshore Underwater Small Modular Reactorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationShirvan, Koroush, Ronald Ballinger, Jacopo Buongiorno, Charles Forsberg, Mujid Kazimi, and Neil Todreas. “Technology Selection for Offshore Underwater Small Modular Reactors.” Nuclear Engineering and Technology 48, no. 6 (December 2016): 1303–1314.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorShirvan, Koroush
dc.contributor.mitauthorBallinger, Ronald G
dc.contributor.mitauthorBuongiorno, Jacopo
dc.contributor.mitauthorForsberg, Charles W
dc.contributor.mitauthorKazimi, Mujid S
dc.contributor.mitauthorTodreas, Neil E
dc.relation.journalNuclear Engineering and Technologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-07-16T16:35:53Z
dspace.orderedauthorsShirvan, Koroush; Ballinger, Ronald; Buongiorno, Jacopo; Forsberg, Charles; Kazimi, Mujid; Todreas, Neilen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5818-9825
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7494-6662
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record