Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJonker, Michiel T. O.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Heijden, Stephan A.
dc.contributor.authorAdelman, Dave
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Yongju
dc.contributor.authorFlavetta, Geanna M.
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Upal
dc.contributor.authorHale, Sarah E.
dc.contributor.authorJalalizadeh, Mehregan
dc.contributor.authorKhairy, Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorLampi, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorLao, Wenjian
dc.contributor.authorLohmann, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorLydy, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorMaruya, Keith A.
dc.contributor.authorNutile, Samuel A.
dc.contributor.authorOen, Amy M. P.
dc.contributor.authorRakowska, Magdalena I.
dc.contributor.authorReible, Danny
dc.contributor.authorRusina, Tatsiana P.
dc.contributor.authorSmedes, Foppe
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yanwen
dc.contributor.authorApell, Jennifer Nicole
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, Robert
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Loretta Ana
dc.contributor.authorGschwend, Philip M
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-06T13:06:49Z
dc.date.available2018-08-06T13:06:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.date.submitted2018-01
dc.identifier.issn0013-936X
dc.identifier.issn1520-5851
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/117274
dc.description.abstractThis work presents the results of an international interlaboratory comparison on ex situ passive sampling in sediments. The main objectives were to map the state of the science in passively sampling sediments, identify sources of variability, provide recommendations and practical guidance for standardized passive sampling, and advance the use of passive sampling in regulatory decision making by increasing confidence in the use of the technique. The study was performed by a consortium of 11 laboratories and included experiments with 14 passive sampling formats on 3 sediments for 25 target chemicals (PAHs and PCBs). The resulting overall interlaboratory variability was large (a factor of ∼10), but standardization of methods halved this variability. The remaining variability was primarily due to factors not related to passive sampling itself, i.e., sediment heterogeneity and analytical chemistry. Excluding the latter source of variability, by performing all analyses in one laboratory, showed that passive sampling results can have a high precision and a very low intermethod variability (<factor of 1.7). It is concluded that passive sampling, irrespective of the specific method used, is fit for implementation in risk assessment and management of contaminated sediments, provided that method setup and performance, as well as chemical analyses are quality-controlled.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipStrategic Environmental Research and Development Program (U.S.) (SERDP, 14 ER03-035/ER-2431/ER- 2538)en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Society (ACS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ACS.EST.7B05752en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceACSen_US
dc.titleAdvancing the Use of Passive Sampling in Risk Assessment and Management of Sediments Contaminated with Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals: Results of an International Ex Situ Passive Sampling Interlaboratory Comparisonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationJonker, Michiel T. O., Stephan A. van der Heijden, Dave Adelman, Jennifer N. Apell, Robert M. Burgess, Yongju Choi, Loretta A. Fernandez, et al. “Advancing the Use of Passive Sampling in Risk Assessment and Management of Sediments Contaminated with Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals: Results of an International Ex Situ Passive Sampling Interlaboratory Comparison.” Environmental Science & Technology 52, no. 6 (February 28, 2018): 3574–3582.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorApell, Jennifer Nicole
dc.contributor.mitauthorBurgess, Robert
dc.contributor.mitauthorFernandez, Loretta Ana
dc.contributor.mitauthorGschwend, Philip M
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Science & Technologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-08-02T18:08:08Z
dspace.orderedauthorsJonker, Michiel T. O.; van der Heijden, Stephan A.; Adelman, Dave; Apell, Jennifer N.; Burgess, Robert M.; Choi, Yongju; Fernandez, Loretta A.; Flavetta, Geanna M.; Ghosh, Upal; Gschwend, Philip M.; Hale, Sarah E.; Jalalizadeh, Mehregan; Khairy, Mohammed; Lampi, Mark A.; Lao, Wenjian; Lohmann, Rainer; Lydy, Michael J.; Maruya, Keith A.; Nutile, Samuel A.; Oen, Amy M. P.; Rakowska, Magdalena I.; Reible, Danny; Rusina, Tatsiana P.; Smedes, Foppe; Wu, Yanwenen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9497-4492
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record