Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRohr, Rudolf P.
dc.contributor.authorSong, Chuliang
dc.contributor.authorSaavedra Sanchez, Serguei
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T18:55:50Z
dc.date.available2018-08-20T18:55:50Z
dc.date.issued2017-08
dc.date.submitted2017-04
dc.identifier.issn0021-8790
dc.identifier.issn1365-2656
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/117428
dc.description.abstractEmpirical studies have found that the mutualistic interactions forming the structure of plant–pollinator networks are typically more nested than expected by chance alone. Additionally, theoretical studies have shown a positive association between the nested structure of mutualistic networks and community persistence. Yet, it has been shown that some plant–pollinator networks may be more nested than others, raising the interesting question of which factors are responsible for such enhanced nested structure. It has been argued that ordered network structures may increase the persistence of ecological communities under less predictable environments. This suggests that nested structures of plant–pollinator networks could be more advantageous under highly seasonal environments. While several studies have investigated the link between nestedness and various environmental variables, unfortunately, there has been no unified answer to validate these predictions. Here, we move from the problem of describing network structures to the problem of comparing network structures. We develop comparative statistics, and apply them to investigate the association between the nested structure of 59 plant–pollinator networks and the temperature seasonality present in their locations. We demonstrate that higher levels of nestedness are associated with a higher temperature seasonality. We show that the previous lack of agreement came from an extended practice of using standardized measures of nestedness that cannot be compared across different networks. Importantly, our observations complement theory showing that more nested network structures can increase the range of environmental conditions compatible with species coexistence in mutualistic systems, also known as structural stability. This increase in nestedness should be more advantageous and occur more often in locations subject to random environmental perturbations, which could be driven by highly changing or seasonal environments. This synthesis of theory and observations could prove relevant for a better understanding of the ecological processes driving the assembly and persistence of ecological communities. Keywords: changing environments; nestedness; network comparison; seasonality; structural stability; z-scoresen_US
dc.publisherWiley Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12749en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT Web Domainen_US
dc.titleWhy are some plant-pollinator networks more nested than others?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSong, Chuliang et al. “Why Are Some Plant-Pollinator Networks More Nested Than Others?” Edited by Anna Eklöf. Journal of Animal Ecology 86, 6 (September 2017): 1417–1424 © 2017 The Authorsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSong, Chuliang
dc.contributor.mitauthorSaavedra Sanchez, Serguei
dc.relation.journalJournal of Animal Ecologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-08-20T18:24:10Z
dspace.orderedauthorsSong, Chuliang; Rohr, Rudolf P.; Saavedra, Sergueien_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7490-8626
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record