Stability analyses for deviated wellbores in unconsolidated cross-anisotropic formations
Author(s)
Akl, Sherif Adel; Whittle, Andrew
Downloadcgj-2015-0456.pdf (1.386Mb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Production of oil from shallow reservoirs typically involves drilling highly deviated wells through unconsolidated (or poorly lithified) rocks or clays. This paper describes numerical analyses of the deformations and stability of deviated wellbores within a K0-consolidated clay. The analyses consider planar deformations in the plane orthogonal to the wellbore using a quasi threedimensional (3D) finite element model that represents coupled flow and deformations within the soil mass. Cross-anisotropic mechanical properties of the clay are described by a generalized effective stress model, MIT-E3, with parameters previously calibrated from laboratory thick-walled cylinder tests. The analyses compute the relationship between the drilling mud pressure and wellbore stability associated with either the onset of localized failure mechanisms or large plastic deformations around the cavity. The results show that short-term, undrained stability requires mud pressures in excess of the in situ formation pore pressures for more highly deviated wellbores at inclinations greater than 45°. The analyses examine the mechanisms for further destabilization, due to consolidation within the formation, and how they are affected by drainage conditions at the wellbore wall. The results provide qualitative information for the design and control of drilling operations for deviated wellbores in unconsolidated formations.
Date issued
2016-05Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringJournal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Citation
Akl, Sherif A.Y., and Andrew J. Whittle. “Stability Analyses for Deviated Wellbores in Unconsolidated Cross-Anisotropic Formations.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal 53, no. 9 (September 2016): 1450–1459.
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
0008-3674
1208-6010