Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFournier, Gregory P.
dc.contributor.authorPoole, Anthony M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-01T17:26:28Z
dc.date.available2018-10-01T17:26:28Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.date.submitted2018-06
dc.identifier.issn1664-302X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118316
dc.description.abstractThe recent discovery of the Lokiarchaeota and other members of the Asgard superphylum suggests that closer analysis of the cell biology and evolution of these groups may help shed light on the origin of the eukaryote cell. Asgard lineages often appear in molecular phylogenies as closely related to eukaryotes, and possess "Eukaryote Signature Proteins" coded by genes previously thought to be unique to eukaryotes. This phylogenetic affinity to eukaryotes has been widely interpreted as indicating that Asgard lineages are "eukaryote-like archaea," with eukaryotes evolving from within a paraphyletic Archaea. Guided by the established principles of systematics, we examine the potential implications of the monophyly of Asgard lineages and Eukarya. We show that a helpful parallel case is that of Synapsida, a group that includes modern mammals and their more "reptile-like" ancestors, united by shared derived characters that evolved in their common ancestor. While this group contains extinct members that share many similarities with modern reptiles and their extinct relatives, they are evolutionarily distinct from Sauropsida, the group which includes modern birds, reptiles, and all other amniotes. Similarly, Asgard lineages and eukaryotes are united by shared derived characters to the exclusion of all other groups. Consequently, the Asgard group is not only highly informative for our understanding of eukaryogenesis, but may be better understood as being early diverging members of a broader group including eukaryotes, for which we propose the name "Eukaryomorpha." Significantly, this means that the relationship between Eukarya and Asgard lineages cannot, on its own, resolve the debate over 2 vs. 3 Domains of life; instead, resolving this debate depends upon identifying the root of Archaea with respect to Bacteria.en_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01896en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceFrontiersen_US
dc.titleA Briefly Argued Case That Asgard Archaea Are Part of the Eukaryote Treeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationFournier, Gregory P., and Anthony M. Poole. “A Briefly Argued Case That Asgard Archaea Are Part of the Eukaryote Tree.” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, Aug. 2018. © 2018 Fournier and Poole.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFournier, Gregory P.
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Microbiologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-09-26T15:47:55Z
dspace.orderedauthorsFournier, Gregory P.; Poole, Anthony M.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1605-5455
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record