Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOlesen, Scott Wilder
dc.contributor.authorAlm, Eric J
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-09T14:05:05Z
dc.date.available2018-10-09T14:05:05Z
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.identifier.issn2058-5276
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118383
dc.description.abstractDysbiosis, an imbalance in the microbiota, has been a major organizing concept in microbiome science. Here, we discuss how the balance concept, a holdover from prescientific thought, is irrelevant to — and may even distract from — useful microbiome research.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.228en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Alm via Howard Silveren_US
dc.titleDysbiosis is not an answeren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationOlesen, Scott W., and Eric J. Alm. “Dysbiosis Is Not an Answer.” Nature Microbiology, vol. 1, no. 12, Dec. 2016.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.approverAlm, Eric Jen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorOlesen, Scott Wilder
dc.contributor.mitauthorAlm, Eric J
dc.relation.journalNature Microbiologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsOlesen, Scott W.; Alm, Eric J.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5400-4945
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-9364
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record