Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoldman, Mark S
dc.contributor.authorFee, Michale Sean
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-09T18:44:40Z
dc.date.available2018-10-09T18:44:40Z
dc.date.issued2017-07
dc.identifier.issn0959-4388
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118398
dc.description.abstractNeuroscience research has become increasingly reliant upon quantitative and computational data analysis and modeling techniques. However, the vast majority of neuroscientists are still trained within the traditional biology curriculum, in which computational and quantitative approaches beyond elementary statistics may be given little emphasis. Here we provide the results of an informal poll of computational and other neuroscientists that sought to identify critical needs, areas for improvement, and educational resources for computational neuroscience training. Motivated by this survey, we suggest steps to facilitate quantitative and computational training for future neuroscientists.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2017.06.007en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Fee via Courtney Crummetten_US
dc.titleComputational training for the next generation of neuroscientistsen_US
dc.title.alternativeComputational training for the next generation of neuroscientistsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationGoldman, Mark S, and Michale S Fee. “Computational Training for the Next Generation of Neuroscientists.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 46 (October 2017): 25–30 © 2017 Elsevier Ltden_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMcGovern Institute for Brain Research at MITen_US
dc.contributor.approverFee, Michael Seanen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorGoldman, Mark S
dc.contributor.mitauthorFee, Michale Sean
dc.relation.journalCurrent Opinion in Neurobiologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsGoldman, Mark S; Fee, Michale Sen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7539-1745
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record