Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBansak, Kirk
dc.contributor.authorHainmueller, Jens
dc.contributor.authorHopkins, Daniel J.
dc.contributor.authorYamamoto, Teppei
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-22T15:11:14Z
dc.date.available2018-10-22T15:11:14Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.identifier.issn1047-1987
dc.identifier.issn1476-4989
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118642
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, political and social scientists have made increasing use of conjoint survey designs to study decision-making. Here, we study a consequential question which researchers confront when implementing conjoint designs: How many choice tasks can respondents perform before survey satisficing degrades response quality? To answer the question, we run a set of experiments where respondents are asked to complete as many as 30 conjoint tasks. Experiments conducted through Amazon's Mechanical Turk and Survey Sampling International demonstrate the surprising robustness of conjoint designs, as there are detectable but quite limited increases in survey satisficing as the number of tasks increases. Our evidence suggests that in similar study contexts researchers can assign dozens of tasks without substantial declines in response quality. Key Words: conjoint analysis, survey experiments, survey fatigue, response biasen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/PAN.2017.40en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceOther repositoryen_US
dc.titleThe Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experimentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBansak, Kirk, et al. “The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis, vol. 26, no. 01, Jan. 2018, pp. 112–19. © 2018 The Authorsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorYamamoto, Teppei
dc.relation.journalPolitical Analysisen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-10-18T17:57:29Z
dspace.orderedauthorsBansak, Kirk; Hainmueller, Jens; Hopkins, Daniel J.; Yamamoto, Teppeien_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-7675
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record