Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHodshire, Anna L.
dc.contributor.authorPalm, Brett B.
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, M. Lizabeth
dc.contributor.authorBian, Qijing
dc.contributor.authorCampuzano-Jost, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorDay, Douglas A.
dc.contributor.authorde Sá, Suzane S.
dc.contributor.authorGuenther, Alex B.
dc.contributor.authorHansel, Armin
dc.contributor.authorJud, Werner
dc.contributor.authorKarl, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorKim, Saewung
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jeong-Hoo
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Zhe
dc.contributor.authorSeco, Roger
dc.contributor.authorSmith, James N.
dc.contributor.authorPierce, Jeffrey R.
dc.contributor.authorCross, Eben
dc.contributor.authorHunter, James Freeman
dc.contributor.authorKroll, Jesse
dc.contributor.authorJimenez, Jose L.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T14:16:54Z
dc.date.available2018-10-23T14:16:54Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.issn1680-7324
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118751
dc.description.abstractOxidation flow reactors (OFRs) allow the concentration of a given atmospheric oxidant to be increased beyond ambient levels in order to study secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation and aging over varying periods of equivalent aging by that oxidant. Previous studies have used these reactors to determine the bulk OA mass and chemical evolution. To our knowledge, no OFR study has focused on the interpretation of the evolving aerosol size distributions. In this study, we use size-distribution measurements of the OFR and an aerosol microphysics model to learn about size-dependent processes in the OFR. Specifically, we use OFR exposures between 0.09 and 0.9 equivalent days of OH aging from the 2011 BEACHON-RoMBAS and GoAmazon2014/5 field campaigns. We use simulations in the TOMAS (TwO-Moment Aerosol Sectional) microphysics box model to constrain the following parameters in the OFR: (1) the rate constant of gas-phase functionalization reactions of organic compounds with OH, (2) the rate constant of gas-phase fragmentation reactions of organic compounds with OH, (3) the reactive uptake coefficient for heterogeneous fragmentation reactions with OH, (4) the nucleation rate constants for three different nucleation schemes, and (5) an effective accommodation coefficient that accounts for possible particle diffusion limitations of particles larger than 60nm in diameter. We find the best model-to-measurement agreement when the accommodation coefficient of the larger particles (Dp>60nm) was 0.1 or lower (with an accommodation coefficient of 1 for smaller particles), which suggests a diffusion limitation in the larger particles. When using these low accommodation-coefficient values, the model agrees with measurements when using a published H2SO4-organics nucleation mechanism and previously published values of rate constants for gas-phase oxidation reactions. Further, gas-phase fragmentation was found to have a significant impact upon the size distribution, and including fragmentation was necessary for accurately simulating the distributions in the OFR. The model was insensitive to the value of the reactive uptake coefficient on these aging timescales. Monoterpenes and isoprene could explain 24%-95% of the observed change in total volume of aerosol in the OFR, with ambient semivolatile and intermediate-volatility organic compounds (S/IVOCs) appearing to explain the remainder of the change in total volume. These results provide support to the mass-based findings of previous OFR studies, give insight to important size-distribution dynamics in the OFR, and enable the design of future OFR studies focused on new particle formation and/or microphysical processes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Department of Energy. Office of Biological and Environmental Research (grant no. DE-SC0011780)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Office of Atmospheric Chemistry, Carbon Cycle, and Climate Program (cooperative agreement award no. NA17OAR430001)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Office of Atmospheric Chemistry, Carbon Cycle, and Climate Program (cooperative agreement award no. NA17OAR4310002)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.). Atmospheric Chemistry program (grant no. AGS-1559607)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.). Atmospheric Chemistry program (grant no. AGS-1558966)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonasen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Pauloen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBrazil Scientific Mobility Programen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (grant NA10OAR4310106 (MIT))en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAustrian Science Fund (project no. L518-N20)en_US
dc.publisherCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12433-2018en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.titleConstraining nucleation, condensation, and chemistry in oxidation flow reactors using size-distribution measurements and aerosol microphysical modelingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHodshire, Anna L., Brett B. Palm, M. Lizabeth Alexander, Qijing Bian, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Eben S. Cross, Douglas A. Day, et al. “Constraining Nucleation, Condensation, and Chemistry in Oxidation Flow Reactors Using Size-Distribution Measurements and Aerosol Microphysical Modeling.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18, no. 16 (August 28, 2018): 12433–12460.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorCross, Eben
dc.contributor.mitauthorHunter, James Freeman
dc.contributor.mitauthorKroll, Jesse
dc.contributor.mitauthorJimenez, Jose L.
dc.relation.journalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physicsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-10-22T15:48:13Z
dspace.orderedauthorsHodshire, Anna L.; Palm, Brett B.; Alexander, M. Lizabeth; Bian, Qijing; Campuzano-Jost, Pedro; Cross, Eben S.; Day, Douglas A.; de Sá, Suzane S.; Guenther, Alex B.; Hansel, Armin; Hunter, James F.; Jud, Werner; Karl, Thomas; Kim, Saewung; Kroll, Jesse H.; Park, Jeong-Hoo; Peng, Zhe; Seco, Roger; Smith, James N.; Jimenez, Jose L.; Pierce, Jeffrey R.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-9199
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-521X
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record