Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJiang, B.
dc.contributor.authorGuo, H.
dc.contributor.authorWhitehill, Andrew Richard
dc.contributor.authorOno, Shuhei
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-02T17:19:59Z
dc.date.available2018-11-02T17:19:59Z
dc.date.issued2014-09
dc.date.submitted2014-08
dc.identifier.issn1680-7375
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118841
dc.description.abstractSignatures of sulfur isotope mass-independent fractionation (S-MIF) have been observed in stratospheric sulfate aerosols deposited in polar ice. The S-MIF signatures are thought to be associated with stratospheric photochemistry following stratospheric volcanic eruptions, but the exact mechanism responsible for the production and preservation of these signatures is debated. In order to identify the origin and the mechanism of preservation for these signatures, a series of laboratory photochemical experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of temperature and added O[subscript 2] on the S-MIF produced by two absorption band systems of SO[subscript 2]: photolysis in the 190 to 220 nm region and photoexcitation in the 250 to 350 nm region. The SO[subscript 2] photolysis (SO[subscript 2] + hν → SO+O) experiments showed S-MIF signals with large [superscript 34]S/[superscript 32]S fractionations, which increases with decreasing temperature. The overall S-MIF pattern observed for photolysis experiments, including high [superscript 34]S/[superscript 32]S fractionations, positive mass-independent anomalies in [superscript 33]S, and negative anomalies in [superscript 36]S, is consistent with a major contribution from optical isotopologue screening effects and data for stratospheric sulfate aerosols. In contrast, SO[subscript 2] photoexcitation produced products with positive S-MIF anomalies in both [superscript 33]S and [superscript 36]S, which is different from stratospheric sulfate aerosols. SO[subscript 2] photolysis in the presence of O[subscript 2] produced SO[subscript 3] with S-MIF signals, suggesting the transfer of the S-MIF anomalies from SO to SO[subscript 3] by the SO + O[subscript 2] + M → SO[subscript 3] + M reaction. This is supported with energy calculations of stationary points on the SO[subscript 3] potential energy surfaces, which indicate that this reaction occurs slowly on a single adiabatic surface, but that it can occur more rapidly through intersystem crossing. Based on our experimental results, we estimate a termolecular rate constant on the order of 10[superscript −37] cm[superscript 6] molecule[superscript −2]s[superscript −1]. This rate can explain the preservation of mass independent isotope signatures in stratospheric sulfate aerosols and provides a minor, but important, oxidation pathway for stratospheric SO[subscript 2]. The production and preservation of S-MIF signals requires a high SO[subscript 2] column density to allow for optical isotopologue screening effects to occur and to generate a large enough signature that it can be preserved. In addition, the SO[subscript 2] plume must reach an altitude of around 20 to 25 km, where SO[subscript 2] photolysis becomes a dominant process. These experiments are the first step towards understanding the origin of the sulfur isotope anomalies in stratospheric sulfate aerosols.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipExobiology Program (U.S.) (NNX10AR85G)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (Award 1338810)en_US
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbHen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5194/ACPD-14-23499-2014en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.titleSO[subscript 2] photolysis as a source for sulfur mass-independent isotope signatures in stratospheric aerosolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationWhitehill, A. R., et al. “SO2 Photolysis as a Source for Sulfur Mass-Independent Isotope Signatures in Stratospheric Aerosols.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, vol. 14, no. 16, Sept. 2014, pp. 23499–554.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorWhitehill, Andrew Richard
dc.contributor.mitauthorOno, Shuhei
dc.relation.journalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussionsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-09-27T18:00:32Z
dspace.orderedauthorsWhitehill, A. R.; Jiang, B.; Guo, H.; Ono, S.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5996-8217
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-9584
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record