Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSharifi, Ayyoob
dc.contributor.authorChelleri, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorFox-Lent, Cate
dc.contributor.authorGrafakos, Stelios
dc.contributor.authorOlazabal, Marta
dc.contributor.authorMoloney, Susie
dc.contributor.authorYumagulova, Lily
dc.contributor.authorYamagata, Yoshiki
dc.contributor.authorPathak, Minal M
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T14:47:16Z
dc.date.available2018-11-29T14:47:16Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119361
dc.description.abstractResilience is a multi-faceted concept frequently used across a wide range of disciplines, practices, and sectors. There is a growing recognition of the utility of resilience as a bridging concept that can facilitate inter-and transdisciplinary approaches to tackle complexities inherent in decision making under conditions of risk and uncertainty. Such conditions are common in urban planning, infrastructure planning, asset management, emergency planning, crisis management, and development processes where systemic interdependencies and interests at stake influence decisions and outcomes. A major challenge that can undermine the use of resilience for guiding planning activities is the value-laden and contested nature of the concept that can be interpreted in a variety of ways. Because resilience is context-specific and generally depends on local aspirations, this issue can be partially tackled by adopting participatory approaches for the conceptualization of resilience. This paper provides an example of how co-design methods can be employed for conceptualizing resilience. The Structured Interview Matrix was used as a technique to facilitate discussions among a diverse group of researchers and practitioners attending the International Workshop on Tools and Indicators for Assessing Urban Resilience. Participants deliberated on issues related to constituent elements of urban resilience, including its position vis-s-à-vis concepts such as adaptation and sustainability, institutional factors that can enable/constrain resilience building, and the challenges of conducting and operationalizing urban resilience assessment. This paper can be considered as an initial step towards further exploration of participatory approaches for clarifying the underlying dimensions of complex concepts such as resilience. Keywords: urban resilience; knowledge co-design; knowledge co-production; bottom-up approach; participatory methods; Structured Interview Matrix; adaptation; sustainability; transdisciplinaryen_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9061032en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.sourceMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteen_US
dc.titleConceptualizing Dimensions and Characteristics of Urban Resilience: Insights from a Co-Design Processen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSharifi, Ayyoob, et al. “Conceptualizing Dimensions and Characteristics of Urban Resilience: Insights from a Co-Design Process.” Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 6, June 2017, p. 1032.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorPathak, Minal M
dc.relation.journalSustainabilityen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-11-22T14:23:32Z
dspace.orderedauthorsSharifi, Ayyoob; Chelleri, Lorenzo; Fox-Lent, Cate; Grafakos, Stelios; Pathak, Minal; Olazabal, Marta; Moloney, Susie; Yumagulova, Lily; Yamagata, Yoshikien_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record